LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19788: Tenda AC1206 httpd web management interface SetOnlineDevName set_device_name stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC1206 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01. This affects the function set_device_name of the file /goform/SetOnlineDevName of the component httpd web management interface. The manipulation of the argument devName results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in one Tenda AC1206 firmware version allows a remote user with management access to trigger a memory overflow through the device-name function. The supplied CVSS assessment indicates possible complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability, but the public evidence does not confirm successful real-world attacks.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed affected devices as an urgent remediation priority, especially when management is remotely reachable. Reduce exposure immediately and obtain current vendor guidance. Replacement should be considered if no supported correction is available, but the supplied sources do not name a patch.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19788 is a stack-based buffer overflow in set_device_name, reached through /goform/SetOnlineDevName in the httpd management interface. Supplying an unsafe devName value can corrupt stack memory. The CVSS 2.0 vector scores 9.0 and indicates network access, low complexity, and single authentication.

Likely exposure

Confirmed scope is Tenda AC1206 firmware 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01. Risk is highest where the web management interface is reachable from untrusted networks or accessible with compromised credentials. The bundle does not establish whether other firmware versions or models are affected.

Exploitation context

A public proof of concept is referenced, so attempted exploitation is plausible. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence establishes active exploitation in the wild. Authentication appears required according to the CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

The evidence identifies the vulnerable endpoint, function, parameter, and stack-overflow class. It does not establish the precise overwrite conditions, reliable code execution, affected-version range beyond the named build, or observed attacks. One submission title references AC12 while the CVE scope names AC1206; validate device identity carefully.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify AC1206 devices running firmware 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01.
  • Restrict web management access to trusted administrative networks and users.
  • Disable internet-facing management access where operationally possible.
  • Check Tenda guidance for patched firmware or supported replacement options.
  • Rotate management credentials if unauthorized access is suspected.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Tenda AC1206 devices and record their exact firmware versions.
  • Confirm management interfaces are unreachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review authentication and web-management logs for unusual device-name changes or repeated requests.
  • Verify any vendor-recommended firmware update is installed successfully.
  • Reassess exposure after configuration or firmware changes without reproducing the overflow.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19788 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19788Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TendaAC120615.03.06.23_multi_TD01Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.