LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1961: Forman: foreman: remote code execution via command injection in websocket proxy

A flaw was found in Foreman. A remote attacker could exploit a command injection vulnerability in Foreman's WebSocket proxy implementation. This vulnerability arises from the system's use of unsanitized hostname values from compute resource providers when constructing shell commands. By operating a malicious compute resource server, an attacker could achieve remote code execution on the Foreman server when a user accesses VM VNC console functionality. This could lead to the compromise of sensitive credentials and the entire managed infrastructure.

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1961 is a high-severity command injection flaw in Foreman's WebSocket proxy. If an attacker controls a malicious compute resource server and a user opens a VM VNC console, commands could run on the Foreman server, risking credentials and managed infrastructure.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for Satellite environments because successful exploitation could compromise the management server and downstream infrastructure. Prioritize patch validation and trusted compute resource review, especially where VNC console access is used.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-78 command injection caused by unsanitized hostname values from compute resource providers being used to construct shell commands in Foreman's WebSocket proxy. CVSS is 8.0 with network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, and user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Red Hat Satellite 6.16 and 6.17 environments using affected Foreman-related packages and VM VNC console functionality with configured compute resource providers.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires a malicious compute resource server and a user accessing VM VNC console functionality.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are PR:L and UI:R: the attacker needs a malicious compute resource server path, and a user must trigger VNC console access. The provided evidence identifies affected Red Hat Satellite versions but does not include exploit publication or fixed package detail.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply relevant Red Hat advisories RHSA-2026:5968, RHSA-2026:5970, or RHSA-2026:5971 where applicable.
  • Check Red Hat CVE guidance for fixed package versions and supported update paths.
  • Restrict compute resource provider configuration to trusted, validated infrastructure only.
  • Limit VM VNC console access to administrators with a clear operational need.
  • Review Foreman and Satellite credentials after suspected exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Red Hat Satellite 6.16 and 6.17 systems across RHEL 8 and RHEL 9.
  • Compare installed affected packages with the versions listed in Red Hat guidance.
  • Review configured compute resource providers for untrusted or unexpected hostnames.
  • Audit recent VM VNC console access involving compute resource providers.
  • Confirm remediation status against Red Hat CVE and RHSA records.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1961 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
3ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.15.9redhat
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.15.9redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1961Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  5. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  6. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  7. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
redhat-SADPforman: Foreman: Remote Code Execution via command injection in WebSocket proxy
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-02-05T10:40:57.141Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-03-26T12:30:45.446Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8foreman, 0:3.12.0.14-1.el8sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9foreman, 0:3.12.0.14-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9foreman, 0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9libcomps, 0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-brotli, 0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-django, 0:4.2.28-0.1.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-pulp-container, 0:2.22.3-1.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-pulp-rpm, 0:3.27.10-2.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-fog-kubevirt, 0:1.5.1-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-foreman_kubevirt, 0:0.4.3-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-katello, 0:4.16.0.14-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-rubyipmi, 0:0.13.0-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9satellite, 0:6.17.7-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9yggdrasil-worker-forwarder, 0:0.0.3-4.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9foreman, 0:3.14.0.14-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9libcomps, 0:0.1.23-0.3.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-brotli, 0:1.2.0-0.1.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-django, 0:4.2.28-0.1.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-pulp-container, 0:2.22.3-1.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9python-pulp-rpm, 0:3.27.10-2.el9pcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-fog-kubevirt, 0:1.5.1-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-foreman_kubevirt, 0:0.4.3-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-katello, 0:4.16.0.14-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9rubygem-rubyipmi, 0:0.13.0-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9satellite, 0:6.17.7-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9yggdrasil-worker-forwarder, 0:0.0.3-4.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9foreman, 0:3.16.0.12-1.el9sataffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6satellite-utils:el8/foremanaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.