LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19586: Pre-Authentication OS Command Injection in Omada Gateways on OpenVPN Server in Omada Gateways

A pre-authentication OS command injection vulnerability has been identified in Omada gateways configured to operate as an OpenVPN Server due to insufficient validation of client-supplied data during OpenVPN connection establishment. An unauthenticated remote attacker may provide specially crafted input influencing backend command execution logic before authentication completes. Exploitation requires the OpenVPN Server feature to be enabled, VPN service reachable by the attacker and attacker to be able to initiate an OpenVPN connection attempt.  Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary command execution, potentially leading to full compromise of the affected device.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remote attacker may compromise a vulnerable Omada gateway before logging in by sending malicious data during an OpenVPN connection attempt. Successful exploitation could give the attacker command execution and potentially full control of the gateway. Risk exists only where the OpenVPN Server feature is enabled and reachable.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate priority for any reachable Omada OpenVPN server. Inventory and contain potentially exposed devices promptly, then apply vendor-confirmed firmware. Devices without enabled, reachable OpenVPN Server are not exposed through the described attack path.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19586 is a pre-authentication OS command injection flaw (CWE-78) in OpenVPN connection-establishment processing. Client-controlled data can influence backend command execution. It is network-accessible, requires no privileges or user interaction, and has a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure is limited to Omada gateways running vulnerable firmware with OpenVPN Server enabled and reachable by an attacker. The supplied product matrix marks every listed entry as default unaffected with version “0,” so it does not reliably establish affected models or firmware versions.

Exploitation context

The attacker must reach the VPN service and initiate an OpenVPN connection attempt; authentication is not required. The supplied record is not marked as CISA KEV, and no supplied evidence confirms active exploitation. Public technical discussion is referenced, but its details are not included in the bundle.

Researcher notes

The vulnerability sits in a pre-authentication OpenVPN processing path and may cross from attacker-controlled protocol data into OS command construction. Exact vulnerable and fixed releases cannot be derived from the supplied matrix because all entries show version “0” and default unaffected. Validate model-specific status directly with the vendor advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Omada gateways operating as reachable OpenVPN servers.
  • Disable OpenVPN Server where it is not operationally required.
  • Restrict VPN-service reachability to trusted networks where feasible.
  • Check TP-Link’s advisory for confirmed affected models and fixed firmware versions.
  • Install vendor-confirmed fixed firmware using the applicable Omada download page.
  • Monitor gateways for unusual OpenVPN attempts or unexplained configuration changes.

Validation and detection

  • Record each gateway’s exact model, hardware revision, and installed firmware.
  • Confirm whether OpenVPN Server is enabled and externally reachable.
  • Compare inventory against the latest TP-Link advisory before declaring exposure.
  • After updating, verify the reported firmware version matches vendor guidance.
  • Confirm intended reachability restrictions remain effective after remediation.
  • Review relevant gateway logs for suspicious pre-authentication connection activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19586 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L——TPLink

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19586Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER7212PC v20unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER605 v20unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER7206 v20unaffected
TP-Link Systems IncER7406 v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER707-M2 v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems IncER7412-M2 v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER8411 v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER706W v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER706W-4G v20unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER706WP-4G v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER703WP-4G-Outdoor v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.DR3220v-4G v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.DR3650v v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.DR3650v-4G v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER603WP-4G-Outdoor v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.DR3150 v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER701-5G-Outdoor v10unaffected
TP-Link Systems Inc.ER605W v20unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.