LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19478: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in GitLab

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.2 before 18.11.11, 19.0 before 19.0.8, 19.1 before 19.1.6, and 19.2 before 19.2.4 that under certain conditions could allow an unauthenticated user to remotely modify or delete public projects and user data via a GraphQL directive.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remote, unauthenticated attacker could, under certain conditions, alter or delete public GitLab projects and user data. The impact is primarily severe data-integrity and availability loss, with some confidentiality impact. GitLab has released corrected versions, so affected deployments should be upgraded urgently.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate patching and integrity-review priority. Unauthenticated remote modification or deletion can disrupt development, damage trusted source repositories, and require recovery from backups. Highest urgency applies to remotely reachable affected instances with valuable public projects. Active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19478 is a CWE-94 code-injection flaw involving a GraphQL directive in GitLab CE/EE. It affects versions from 18.2 before 18.11.11, 19.0 before 19.0.8, 19.1 before 19.1.6, and 19.2 before 19.2.4. CVSS 3.1 is 9.4: network-accessible, low complexity, unauthenticated, and requiring no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Potentially exposed organizations operate GitLab CE/EE within the specified version ranges, particularly where GitLab is remotely reachable and contains public projects. The bundle does not establish whether every deployment configuration meets the unspecified conditions required for exploitation.

Exploitation context

The flaw requires no authentication or user interaction and can reportedly affect public projects and user data remotely. A technical HackerOne report is referenced, but the source bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation in the wild, and the CVE is not identified as being in KEV.

Researcher notes

The stated weakness is CWE-94 through a GraphQL directive, with high integrity and availability impact. The phrase “under certain conditions” is not defined in the supplied description, so configuration-level exploitability cannot be determined from this bundle alone. The HackerOne report and GitLab work item are the appropriate sources for deeper technical conditions without assuming universal exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected branches to 18.11.11, 19.0.8, 19.1.6, 19.2.4, or a later applicable release.
  • Prioritize internet-reachable instances and deployments hosting important public projects or user data.
  • Preserve backups and relevant audit records before remediation and investigation.
  • If upgrading is delayed, consult GitLab's patch advisory for vendor-supported temporary guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all GitLab CE/EE deployments and record their complete installed versions.
  • Confirm each deployment is outside the affected ranges or successfully upgraded to an applicable corrected version.
  • Review audit records for unexpected public-project changes, deletions, and user-data modifications.
  • Validate public-project and user-data integrity against trusted backups or authoritative records.
  • Check GitLab's advisory and work item for updated indicators, conditions, or remediation guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19478 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H3.95.5GitLab

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-19478Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GitLabGitLab18.2, 19.0, 19.1, 19.2unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code

Improper Control of Generation of Code represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.