LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-18574: Authentication Bypass in Check Point Security Management Server

An authentication bypass vulnerability in Check Point Security Management Server and Multi-Domain Security Management Server (MDS) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to Management services to execute arbitrary commands on the Security Management Server. Successful exploitation could result in full compromise of the Security Management system. Check Point discovered this issue internally and has no indication of active exploitation.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remote attacker who can reach Check Point Management services may bypass authentication and run arbitrary commands without credentials. Successful exploitation could fully compromise the security management system, threatening configuration integrity and administrative control across managed environments.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate critical remediation priority. A compromised management server could undermine centralized security administration. Require rapid inventory, exposure reduction, vendor-guided remediation, and evidence of completion, beginning with reachable systems.

Technical view

CVE-2026-18574 is a CWE-288 authentication bypass affecting specified Check Point Security Management Server and Multi-Domain Security Management Server releases. It requires network access but no privileges or user interaction. Check Point assigns CVSS 4.0 score 9.3; successful exploitation permits arbitrary command execution on the management server.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists where an affected release is installed and an untrusted attacker can reach its Management services. Internet-accessible or broadly reachable management interfaces present greater practical risk. The supplied sources do not identify specific ports, configurations, or deployment prevalence.

Exploitation context

Check Point discovered the issue internally and reports no indication of active exploitation. The supplied record is not flagged as CISA KEV. Absence of observed exploitation does not reduce the potential impact if Management services are reachable.

Researcher notes

Affected thresholds include R82.10 Take 39 or below, R82 Take 121 or below, and R81.20 Take 160 or below. Listed older branches from R81.10 through R80 are also affected. The supplied sources provide no exploit details, indicators of compromise, or explicit remediation text.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Security Management and Multi-Domain Security Management servers, including installed release and Jumbo Hotfix Take.
  • Compare each system against the affected versions listed in Check Point advisory sk185222.
  • Consult sk185222 for the vendor-approved remediation and apply it according to Check Point guidance.
  • Restrict Management service access to authorized administrative networks while remediation is pending.
  • Prioritize externally reachable or broadly accessible management servers for immediate treatment.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm every management server's product, release, and installed Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take.
  • Verify affected Management services are unreachable from untrusted networks.
  • Confirm the vendor-prescribed remediation from sk185222 is installed successfully.
  • Review available management and system logs for unexplained command activity or unauthorized administrative changes.
  • Reassess exposure after remediation without performing offensive exploitation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-18574 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Ncheckpoint

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-18574Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
checkpointSecurity Management ServerR82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 39 or below, R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 121 or below, R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 160 or below, R81.10, R81, R80.40, R80.30, R80.20, R80.10, R80Listed
checkpointMulti-Domain Security Management ServerR82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 39 or below, R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 121 or below, R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 160 or below, R81.10, R81, R80.40, R80.30, R80.20, R80.10, R80Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-288 · source CWE mapping

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.