LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1796: StyleBidet <= 1.0.0 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

The StyleBidet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the URL path in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1796 affects the StyleBidet WordPress plugin through version 1.0.0. An attacker could craft a malicious link that runs script in a victim’s browser if the victim clicks it. This is not reported as actively exploited, but it can support phishing, session abuse, or content manipulation in the affected site context.

Executive priority

Handle in the normal vulnerability remediation cycle, prioritizing public WordPress sites and sites used by privileged users. Escalate if the plugin is broadly deployed or if credible exploitation evidence appears.

Technical view

The issue is reflected cross-site scripting via the URL path, caused by insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. It is unauthenticated, network-reachable, low complexity, and requires user interaction. CVSS 3.1 score is 6.1 with scope changed, low confidentiality impact, low integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with the StyleBidet plugin installed at version 1.0.0 or earlier and reachable by targeted users.

Exploitation context

The attacker must persuade a user to open a crafted URL. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The public record identifies the vulnerable sink location and CWE-79, but the provided sources do not name a fixed version or vendor patch. Treat remediation status as incomplete and verify directly with trusted plugin distribution sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the StyleBidet plugin and installed version.
  • Check the plugin vendor or WordPress plugin page for updated remediation guidance.
  • Update to a fixed version if one is available from trusted sources.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not required.
  • Use security controls that reduce reflected XSS risk where available.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether StyleBidet is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it with affected versions through 1.0.0.
  • Review vendor, Wordfence, and CVE references for any newly published fixed version.
  • Verify that public pages no longer reflect URL-path input unsafely after remediation.
  • Monitor user reports and web logs for suspicious crafted-link activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1796 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1796Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
indextwoStyleBidet0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.