LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1757: Libxml2: memory leak leading to local denial of service in xmllint interactive shell

A flaw was identified in the interactive shell of the xmllint utility, part of the libxml2 project, where memory allocated for user input is not properly released under certain conditions. When a user submits input consisting only of whitespace, the program skips command execution but fails to free the allocated buffer. Repeating this action causes memory to continuously accumulate. Over time, this can exhaust system memory and terminate the xmllint process, creating a denial-of-service condition on the local system.

MediumCVSS 6.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A memory-management flaw in xmllint’s interactive shell can consume increasing amounts of memory when whitespace-only input is repeatedly submitted. This may terminate xmllint or exhaust local system memory, disrupting availability. The issue is local and the supplied evidence does not show data theft, data modification, remote exploitation, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a normal-priority availability fix, accelerated on shared systems where local users or automation can run xmllint interactively. It is not supported as an internet-scale emergency by the supplied evidence. Prioritize patching systems where memory exhaustion could affect neighboring workloads, production nodes, or container platforms.

Technical view

CVE-2026-1757 is a CWE-401 memory leak in libxml2’s xmllint interactive shell. A whitespace-only input path skips command execution without releasing the allocated input buffer. Repetition causes unbounded memory growth and local denial of service. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 6.2: local access, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists where affected Red Hat packages are installed and users or automation can operate xmllint interactively. Listed affected products include RHEL 7–10, specific Hardened Images, JBoss Core Services, and OpenShift 4 components. RHEL 6 status is unknown. The supplied sources do not establish remote reachability or exposure through ordinary XML parsing.

Exploitation context

The failure requires repeated whitespace-only input within xmllint’s local interactive shell. No privilege is required according to the supplied CVSS vector, but access to invoke or control the utility is necessary. CISA KEV status is false, and the source bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation or public weaponization.

Researcher notes

The vulnerable behavior is narrowly described as an unreleased input buffer on the whitespace-only interactive-shell path. Package-level affected status does not prove that every deployment exercises this path. RHEL 6 applicability remains unresolved in the supplied data. Researchers should distinguish interactive xmllint exposure from applications that merely link libxml2; no broader parser impact is documented here.

Mitigation direction

  • Review RHSA-2026:7519 and apply Red Hat’s listed update wherever applicable.
  • Inventory affected libxml2 and OpenShift component packages across hosts, images, and containers.
  • Restrict unnecessary access to xmllint’s interactive shell until remediation is complete.
  • Avoid unattended workflows that expose or repeatedly feed the interactive shell.
  • Check vendor guidance for RHEL 6 because its supplied status is unknown.

Validation and detection

  • Compare installed package versions with RHSA-2026:7519 and Red Hat’s CVE record.
  • Identify scripts, services, or users that invoke xmllint in interactive mode.
  • Confirm updated hosts and container images no longer contain superseded packages.
  • Monitor xmllint processes for unexpected sustained memory growth or termination.
  • Verify RHEL 6 applicability directly with current Red Hat guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-401: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1757 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.2CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.53.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.2Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1757Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imageslibxml2-main, 2.15.2-0.3.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libxml2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libxml2unknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libxml2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libxml2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libxml2affected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Core Serviceslibxml2affected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8affected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-401 · source CWE mapping

Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.