Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-1714 lets unauthenticated outsiders abuse vulnerable ShopLentor WordPress sites as email relays. An attacker could send spam or phishing emails that appear to originate from the victim site. The primary business risk is brand damage, mail blocklisting, customer trust loss, and incident response workload.
Executive priority
Treat this as a near-term remediation item for ecommerce WordPress properties. It is not shown as actively exploited in the provided sources, but unauthenticated abuse could quickly harm email reputation and customer trust.
Technical view
ShopLentor for WordPress is vulnerable through version 3.3.2 in the 'woolentor_suggest_price_action' AJAX action. Missing validation on 'send_to', 'product_title', 'wlmessage', and 'wlemail' allows arbitrary email generation, including sender manipulation through CRLF injection. CVSS is 8.6 high, CWE-93.
Likely exposure
Internet-facing WordPress sites running ShopLentor up to and including 3.3.2 are the likely exposure. The issue is unauthenticated and reachable over the network. Sites not running the plugin, or running versions outside the affected range per vendor guidance, are not indicated as affected.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. However, the vulnerability is low-complexity, requires no account, and can support spam or phishing campaigns using the victim site’s mail path.
Researcher notes
The public record identifies parameter validation failures and CRLF injection in 'wlemail'. WordPress Trac references show the relevant AJAX code and a later changeset, but the provided bundle does not clearly name a fixed release. Avoid assuming patch version without vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites for the ShopLentor plugin and its installed version.
- Update ShopLentor according to vendor guidance for versions newer than 3.3.2.
- If no update is available, consider disabling or removing the plugin temporarily.
- Review outbound mail controls, rate limits, and sender authentication for affected sites.
- Monitor mail logs for unusual recipient volume or unexpected sender values.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether ShopLentor is installed on each WordPress site.
- Record the exact plugin version and compare it with the affected range.
- Review web logs for requests referencing 'woolentor_suggest_price_action'.
- Review outbound mail logs for unusual spikes or unexpected external recipients.
- Check vendor and Wordfence advisories for corrected version details.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-93: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-1714 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.6 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N3.94Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
8.6HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/cf326914-6a38-4984-a2a7-66e05f41a96b?source=cveCVE reference
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/woolentor-addons/trunk/classes/class.ajax_actions.php#L170CVE reference
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/woolentor-addons/tags/3.3.1/classes/class.ajax_actions.php#L170CVE reference
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3461704/woolentor-addons/trunk/classes/class.ajax_actions.php?contextall=1CVE reference
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.