LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1672: BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net <= 1.1.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Product Data Modification

The BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the woobe_redraw_table_row() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update WooCommerce product data including prices, descriptions, and other product fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or shop manager into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A WordPress WooCommerce admin or shop manager could be tricked into clicking a crafted link that changes product data in BEAR Bulk Editor through version 1.1.5. The main business risk is product integrity: prices, descriptions, and other fields could be altered without attacker login.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority ecommerce integrity issue. It is not described as wormable or actively exploited, but product tampering can create direct revenue, fraud, and customer-trust impact. Prioritize stores using the plugin in production.

Technical view

CVE-2026-1672 is a CWE-352 CSRF flaw in woobe_redraw_table_row() caused by missing nonce validation. It is network reachable and unauthenticated, but requires privileged user interaction. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.5, with high integrity impact and no stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running WooCommerce with BEAR Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional through 1.1.5. Stores without this plugin are not indicated as affected. The provided affected-version metadata is incomplete, so confirm against plugin inventory and vendor records.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The described scenario requires social engineering a site administrator or shop manager into performing an action, such as clicking a link, that sends a forged product-update request.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the CVE description, Wordfence advisory, CleanTalk research link, and WordPress Trac references. The bundle identifies the vulnerable function and missing nonce validation, but does not provide complete fixed-version metadata. Avoid assuming exploit-in-the-wild status.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all sites using the affected BEAR WooCommerce bulk editor plugin.
  • Update the plugin if vendor guidance provides a fixed release beyond 1.1.5.
  • Restrict administrator and shop-manager sessions to trusted workstations and workflows.
  • Review WooCommerce product changes for unexpected price, description, or field updates.
  • Monitor vendor, Wordfence, and WordPress plugin repository guidance for confirmed remediation details.

Validation and detection

  • Check WordPress plugin inventory for woo-bulk-editor / BEAR versions through 1.1.5.
  • Review product audit logs for unauthorized price, description, or metadata changes.
  • Confirm whether the installed plugin version includes nonce validation for woobe_redraw_table_row().
  • Verify administrative users have not recently interacted with suspicious links or messages.
  • Track remediation status against the referenced WordPress Trac changesets and vendor advisories.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1672 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1672Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineWordfence

    Vendor Notified

  3. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
realmag777BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.