LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-16610: Admin and Site Enhancements (ASE) Pro <= 8.9.0 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via PHP Code Injection via cfgroup[input] Repeater Row Key

The Admin and Site Enhancements (ASE) Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 8.9.0 via the recursive_html function. This is due to the frontend save handler enforces only a publicly emitted nonce with no authentication check, CAPTCHA validation is bypassable by omitting an attacker-supplied key, and repeater row keys from cfgroup[input] are stored verbatim and later spliced into an eval() call in recursive_html without any sanitization or identifier validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server. This requires the [post_cf_form] shortcode to be present on at least one publicly accessible page, as the nonce and session ID needed to reach the vulnerable save handler are emitted to unauthenticated visitors by that shortcode.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A public WordPress page using ASE Pro’s form shortcode can expose what an attacker needs to reach a vulnerable save function. An unauthenticated attacker could then run code on the server, potentially stealing data, changing the site, or disrupting service. The issue affects ASE Pro through version 8.9.0 when the stated shortcode condition exists.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate remediation priority for internet-facing sites meeting both exposure conditions. The vulnerability can permit full server-side code execution without credentials. Rapidly identify affected sites, contain the public form path, and investigate for compromise; however, do not claim an incident solely from vulnerability presence.

Technical view

The frontend handler relies on a publicly exposed nonce without authentication, while CAPTCHA enforcement can be bypassed by omission. Unsanitized repeater row keys from cfgroup[input] are stored and later inserted into an eval() call by recursive_html. Exploitation requires a publicly accessible page containing the [post_cf_form] shortcode. CVSS is 9.8.

Likely exposure

Internet-facing WordPress installations running ASE Pro 8.9.0 or earlier are exposed only if at least one public page contains [post_cf_form]. Sites without that shortcode condition are not described as reachable through this path. The bundle’s affected-version metadata is inconsistent, so confirm installed versions directly.

Exploitation context

The attack is remote, requires no authentication or user interaction, and has low stated complexity. Successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The decisive exposure chain is public shortcode output, unauthenticated save-handler access, bypassable CAPTCHA logic, verbatim repeater keys, and later eval() interpolation. The bundle names CWE-434, although its narrative specifically describes PHP code injection. No confirmed patched version, vendor fix, public exploit, or observed exploitation is established by the supplied evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify ASE Pro installations running version 8.9.0 or earlier.
  • Remove or restrict public access to pages containing [post_cf_form].
  • Disable the affected plugin where business operations permit.
  • Check ASE and Wordfence guidance for a confirmed fixed release or vendor mitigation.
  • Review potentially exposed sites for compromise before restoring functionality.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the installed ASE Pro version on every WordPress site.
  • Inventory public pages and templates containing the [post_cf_form] shortcode.
  • Verify affected pages are removed, restricted, or no longer publicly reachable.
  • Review server, WordPress, and security logs for unexpected requests or code changes.
  • Confirm remediation against current ASE or Wordfence guidance before re-enabling forms.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-434: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-16610 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
4Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-16610Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ASEAdmin and Site Enhancements (ASE) Pro0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-434 · source CWE mapping

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.