CVE-2026-1615: Versions of the package jsonpath before 1.3.0 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via unsafe evaluat...
Versions of the package jsonpath before 1.3.0 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via unsafe evaluation of user-supplied JSON Path expressions. The library relies on the static-eval module to process JSON Path input, which is not designed to handle untrusted data safely. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a malicious JSON Path expression that, when evaluated, executes arbitrary JavaScript code, leading to Remote Code Execution in Node.js environments or Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in browser contexts. This affects all methods that evaluate JSON Paths against objects, including .query, .nodes, .paths, .value, .parent, and .apply.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
The jsonpath library can execute attacker-supplied JavaScript when an application evaluates an untrusted JSON Path. A successful attack could compromise a Node.js service or run script in a user’s browser. Risk depends on whether external input reaches the library’s path-evaluation methods.
Executive priority
Treat internet-facing or multi-tenant systems that evaluate externally influenced JSON Paths as an immediate priority. Upgrade rapidly and restrict that input path pending deployment. Systems using the package only with fixed, trusted expressions remain affected by version but have lower practical exposure; validate rather than assuming safety.
Technical view
jsonpath versions before 1.3.0 unsafely evaluate JSON Path expressions through static-eval. The issue affects query, nodes, paths, value, parent, and apply. Crafted expressions may cause arbitrary JavaScript execution, producing remote code execution in Node.js or cross-site scripting in browsers. It is classified as CWE-94 with CVSS 3.1 score 9.8.
Likely exposure
Exposure includes applications using jsonpath before 1.3.0, directly or transitively, including the org.webjars.npm:jsonpath packaging. Practical exposure is highest where users, API clients, uploaded content, or other untrusted sources can influence JSON Path expressions evaluated by affected methods.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources describe network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation with low complexity and no user interaction. They do not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as CISA KEV in the bundle. Public technical references and a corrective commit exist, so prompt remediation remains warranted.
Researcher notes
The central condition is attacker influence over the evaluated path expression, not merely the JSON object being searched. Review wrappers and indirect call sites for all six named methods. The bundle supports arbitrary code execution impact and a 1.3.0 boundary, but provides no evidence here of observed exploitation or confirmed compromise indicators.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade jsonpath to version 1.3.0 or later after compatibility testing.
Update affected org.webjars.npm:jsonpath dependencies using applicable vendor guidance.
Prevent untrusted input from controlling JSON Path expressions until upgrades are complete.
Apply relevant Red Hat errata where affected Red Hat products supply the component.
Validation and detection
Inventory direct and transitive jsonpath and org.webjars.npm:jsonpath dependencies.
Confirm deployed artifacts contain jsonpath 1.3.0 or later.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
3CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
12Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
3 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-94 · source CWE mapping
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.