LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-16142: TrueBooker <= 1.2.6 - Unauthenticated Account Takeover via Insecure Direct Object Reference in 'truebooker_wp_user_id' Parameter

The TrueBooker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Account Takeover in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This is due to the add_front_user_update() AJAX handler being registered for unauthenticated users and accepting an arbitrary truebooker_wp_user_id value, which is passed directly to wp_update_user() without verifying authentication or ownership. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change any WordPress user account email address, including an administrator, by submitting the target user ID and an attacker-controlled email address. An attacker can then use the native WordPress password reset flow to receive the reset link at the attacker-controlled email address and take over the account.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

TrueBooker versions through 1.2.6 can reportedly let an unauthenticated internet attacker change a WordPress administrator’s email address. The attacker could then use WordPress password recovery to seize the account, potentially gaining full control of the website and its data.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate remediation priority on internet-facing WordPress sites. Inventory affected installations, reduce exposure, and follow vendor guidance promptly. Begin incident review where administrator email addresses changed unexpectedly, because successful exploitation can lead directly to complete website compromise.

Technical view

The unauthenticated add_front_user_update() AJAX handler accepts a caller-supplied truebooker_wp_user_id and passes it to wp_update_user() without verifying authentication or account ownership. This IDOR, classified as CWE-639, permits arbitrary user email changes and enables account takeover through the standard password-reset process.

Likely exposure

WordPress sites running TrueBooker 1.2.6 or earlier are potentially exposed, especially when the vulnerable AJAX functionality is internet-accessible. Successful administrator takeover could affect site content, customer information, credentials, availability, and downstream systems administered through WordPress.

Exploitation context

The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 because exploitation is remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated, and requires no user interaction. The bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Practical exploitability nevertheless appears high from the described authorization failure.

Researcher notes

The narrative identifies versions through 1.2.6 as vulnerable, but the structured affected entry lists version “0” with default status unaffected. Treat this as a source-data inconsistency and verify scope against current vendor guidance. The supplied sources do not establish a fixed version, exploitation in the wild, or a confirmed patch status.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize every WordPress site running TrueBooker 1.2.6 or earlier.
  • Check official plugin and vendor guidance for a corrected release or approved mitigation.
  • Temporarily deactivate or remove the affected plugin where operationally acceptable.
  • Reset compromised administrator credentials and restore unauthorized email changes if evidence is found.
  • Restrict WordPress administration exposure and monitor account changes while remediation is pending.

Validation and detection

  • Record the installed TrueBooker version on every WordPress instance.
  • Confirm whether the unauthenticated update handler is present without attempting account modification.
  • Review administrator email changes, newly created privileged users, and unexpected role changes.
  • Examine password-reset activity and security logs for unexplained administrator account recovery.
  • After remediation, verify administrators retain expected email addresses, roles, and access.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-16142 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-16142Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineWordfence

    Vendor Notified

  3. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
themetechmountTrueBooker – Appointment Booking and Scheduler System0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-639 · source CWE mapping

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.