CVE-2026-16019: SQL Injection in Faydam Innovation's FAYDAM Datalogger
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Faydam Innovation Inc. FAYDAM Datalogger allows SQL Injection.
This issue affects FAYDAM Datalogger: from 2.7.1 before 2.8.0.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
FAYDAM Datalogger versions from 2.7.1 through versions earlier than 2.8.0 contain a critical SQL injection flaw. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially access, alter, or disrupt database-backed information and service operations. Actual deployment exposure is not documented in the supplied sources.
Executive priority
Prioritize immediate identification and upgrade of affected deployments, especially externally accessible or operationally important systems. The vulnerability's unauthenticated network attack path and potential full data and service impact justify critical handling, despite no confirmed active exploitation in the supplied evidence.
Technical view
CVE-2026-16019 is CWE-89 improper neutralization of SQL command elements. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, with network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The assessment indicates high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Specific vulnerable endpoints and parameters are not publicly identified in the supplied evidence.
Likely exposure
Deployments running FAYDAM Datalogger 2.7.1 or later but earlier than 2.8.0 are affected. Network-reachable instances warrant the greatest urgency. The sources do not establish whether the product is normally internet-facing or how widely vulnerable versions are deployed.
Exploitation context
The supplied record is not listed in CISA KEV, and no cited source confirms active exploitation or public exploit availability. The CVSS vector nevertheless indicates remotely reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity attack potential. Treat exploitation status as unconfirmed, not absent.
Researcher notes
The public bundle identifies the weakness class, affected range, and CVSS vector but not the vulnerable endpoint, parameter, database technology, discovery method, or proof of concept. Validate exposure through version and architecture review; avoid inferring implementation details. Recheck vendor and government advisories for additional technical indicators.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade affected FAYDAM Datalogger installations to version 2.8.0 or later.
Review Faydam Innovation and government advisory guidance before deployment.
Restrict network access to the datalogger until remediation is verified.
Monitor database and application logs for suspicious queries or unexplained changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory all FAYDAM Datalogger installations and record their exact versions.
Confirm no installation runs version 2.7.1 or later below 2.8.0.
Identify whether affected systems are internet-facing or reachable from untrusted networks.
Review logs for anomalous database errors, access patterns, data changes, or outages.
Verify upgraded systems report version 2.8.0 or later and operate normally.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup
Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-89 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.