LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1536: Libsoup: libsoup: http header injection or response splitting via crlf injection in content-disposition header

A flaw was found in libsoup. An attacker who can control the input for the Content-Disposition header can inject CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) sequences into the header value. These sequences are then interpreted verbatim when the HTTP request or response is constructed, allowing arbitrary HTTP headers to be injected. This vulnerability can lead to HTTP header injection or HTTP response splitting without requiring authentication or user interaction.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1536 affects libsoup, an HTTP library used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux packages. If an attacker can control a Content-Disposition header value, they may inject extra HTTP headers. This can affect integrity of HTTP traffic, but published severity is medium and no active exploitation is cited in the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority integrity issue. It is not currently cited as exploited, but it affects common enterprise Linux platforms and can enable header manipulation where applications pass untrusted data into HTTP headers.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-93 CRLF injection in libsoup/libsoup3 handling of Content-Disposition header input. CRLF sequences may be interpreted verbatim during HTTP request or response construction, enabling HTTP header injection or response splitting. CVSS is 5.8, network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, changed scope, low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where RHEL 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 systems use libsoup or libsoup3 in applications that place attacker-controlled data into Content-Disposition headers.

Exploitation context

Sources state exploitation requires attacker control of Content-Disposition header input and does not require authentication or user interaction. There is no KEV listing and no cited evidence of active exploitation in the provided bundle.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, Red Hat affected-product metadata, Bugzilla, and GNOME issue references. The bundle does not name fixed versions, patches, or proof-of-concept details. Avoid assuming all libsoup-using applications are exploitable; input control over Content-Disposition is key.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Red Hat and GNOME/libsoup advisories for fixed package availability and upgrade guidance.
  • Inventory RHEL systems with libsoup or libsoup3 installed.
  • Review applications that build Content-Disposition headers using untrusted input.
  • Reject or sanitize carriage return and line feed characters in header values.
  • Prioritize internet-facing services that process attacker-supplied filenames or download metadata.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed libsoup or libsoup3 package versions across RHEL assets.
  • Identify services or applications linked against libsoup.
  • Review code paths that set Content-Disposition from user-controlled data.
  • Monitor vendor references for status changes, errata, or backported fixes.
  • Check logs for suspicious header anomalies, without treating absence as proof of safety.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-93: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1536 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1536Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libsoup3affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libsoupaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libsoupaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoupaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsoupaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-93 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.