LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1489: Glib: glib: memory corruption via integer overflow in unicode case conversion

A flaw was found in GLib. An integer overflow vulnerability in its Unicode case conversion implementation can lead to memory corruption. By processing specially crafted and extremely large Unicode strings, an attacker could trigger an undersized memory allocation, resulting in out-of-bounds writes. This could cause applications utilizing GLib for string conversion to crash or become unstable.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

GLib has a memory corruption flaw in Unicode case conversion. A maliciously large Unicode string could make affected applications crash or behave unpredictably. The listed exposure is mainly Red Hat Enterprise Linux packages using GLib. This is medium severity because user interaction is required and the known impact is limited integrity and availability, not data theft.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate patch-management issue, not an emergency. Prioritize internet-facing or user-facing systems that process large text inputs, and track vendor fixes. Absence from KEV lowers urgency, but GLib is widely used, so inventory accuracy matters.

Technical view

CVE-2026-1489 is an integer overflow in GLib Unicode case conversion leading to undersized allocation and out-of-bounds writes. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, low integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations may be exposed through affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 packages, including glib2, mingw-glib2, librsvg2, and listed GLib-dependent packages. Practical risk is highest where applications process attacker-supplied, extremely large Unicode strings.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not report active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Exploitation requires a crafted, very large Unicode string processed by an application using vulnerable GLib conversion paths, with user interaction required under the CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies the bug class and affected Red Hat package families, but the bundle does not provide fixed versions, proof of exploitation, or detailed Siemens product impact. Validate exposure through package inventory and application data-flow review rather than assuming every GLib installation is reachable.

Mitigation direction

  • Track Red Hat, GNOME GLib, and Siemens advisory status for fixed packages or vendor guidance.
  • Update affected GLib-related packages when vendor fixes are available for your platform.
  • Prioritize systems running applications that parse external or user-supplied Unicode text.
  • Apply input size limits where applications accept untrusted large Unicode strings.
  • Reduce exposure of GLib-consuming services that unnecessarily process untrusted text.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory affected RHEL versions and packages listed in the CVE bundle.
  • Map installed glib2, mingw-glib2, librsvg2, and dependent packages to vendor advisory status.
  • Identify applications using GLib Unicode case conversion on untrusted input paths.
  • Confirm whether Siemens-advised products exist in your environment.
  • Check vendor advisories for fixed package versions before closing remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1489 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1489Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
siemens-SADPADP container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10bootcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10glycin-loadersaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10loupeaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10mingw-glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10papersaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10rpm-ostreeaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8librsvg2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8mingw-glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9bootcaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9librsvg2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9mingw-glib2affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.