The SoftMarket — Digital Marketplace WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not properly validate an authentication token in one branch of its email-verification flow, allowing unauthenticated attackers to obtain a valid session as any verified user by supplying only that user's ID.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
SoftMarket through version 1.0.0 may let an internet-based attacker impersonate any verified user without credentials or user interaction. Successful abuse could expose marketplace information and allow unauthorized actions under the victim’s account. Availability impact is not established.
Executive priority
Treat as an immediate remediation priority on internet-facing WordPress sites. The reported outcome is credential-free account takeover with high confidentiality and integrity impact. Establish ownership, identify affected installations, contain exposure, and seek authoritative vendor remediation promptly.
Technical view
One branch of the plugin’s email-verification flow fails to validate an authentication token correctly. An unauthenticated attacker reportedly needs only a verified user’s ID to obtain a valid session as that user. This is classified as improper authentication, CWE-287, with CVSS 3.1 score 9.1.
Likely exposure
WordPress sites running SoftMarket — Digital Marketplace version 1.0.0 or earlier are potentially exposed, particularly when the affected email-verification flow is publicly reachable. The bundle does not identify deployment prevalence, default configuration, or a confirmed fixed version.
Exploitation context
The weakness is remotely reachable, requires no privileges or user interaction, and has low stated attack complexity. The provided WPScan reference is tagged for exploitation information, but the bundle contains no evidence of active attacks. CVE-2026-14557 is not listed as KEV in the supplied data.
Researcher notes
The supplied record supports an authentication-bypass condition in one verification-flow branch, affecting releases through 1.0.0. It does not establish the token format, endpoint details, logging indicators, affected default settings, exploitation prevalence, or a patched version. Avoid assuming that password resets alone prevent renewed compromise while the vulnerable flow remains available.
Mitigation direction
Identify and prioritize every site running SoftMarket version 1.0.0 or earlier.
Check vendor and WordPress plugin guidance for a confirmed fixed release or approved mitigation.
Disable or remove the affected plugin where operationally feasible until authoritative remediation is available.
After remediation, invalidate existing sessions and require affected users to authenticate again.
Increase monitoring for anomalous account access while exposure remains.
Validation and detection
Inventory WordPress installations and record the installed SoftMarket version.
Confirm whether the plugin’s email-verification functionality is enabled and internet-accessible.
Review authentication and session records for unexpected access involving verified users.
Verify the plugin is disabled, removed, or updated according to authoritative vendor guidance.
Confirm pre-remediation sessions have been invalidated after containment.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-287: Credential and account abuse lookup
Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-287 · source CWE mapping
Improper Authentication
Improper Authentication represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.