LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1413: Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System HTTP POST Request port_validate portValidate command injection

A vulnerability was found in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System up to 3.0.12. This affects the function portValidate of the file /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument port results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1413 is a command injection issue in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System through version 3.0.12. A remote authenticated user may manipulate a port value to run unintended system commands. Public proof-of-concept information is reported, but the provided sources do not show known active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a timely remediation item, not a confirmed emergency. The risk is meaningful because command injection can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability, but the cited scoring requires authentication and no active exploitation is confirmed.

Technical view

The issue affects the portValidate function in /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate within the HTTP POST request handler. Manipulation of the port argument can lead to command injection. VulDB lists CWE-74 and CWE-77 and CVSS 2.0 score 6.5 with network access, low complexity, and authentication required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.12 are reachable by authenticated users, especially over administrative networks or remote access paths.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says an exploit has been made public and could be used. CVSS indicates authentication is required. CISA KEV status is false, and no provided source confirms active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is primarily from VulDB and CVE data. The provided sources do not name a vendor patch, workaround, or fixed release. One GitHub reference is tagged as broken-link in the bundle, so rely on authoritative CVE/VulDB details and verify vendor advisories directly.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Sangfor guidance for fixed versions or official mitigations.
  • Limit access to the management system to trusted administrative networks.
  • Review and reduce user accounts with access to the affected interface.
  • Monitor for suspicious POST activity to the affected endpoint.
  • Apply compensating controls until vendor remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Sangfor OSM deployments and record exact versions.
  • Identify systems running versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.12.
  • Confirm whether the affected endpoint is reachable by users.
  • Review logs for unusual requests to /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate.
  • Check vendor and CVE sources for updated remediation details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1413 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR86.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 2.0 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 2.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-1413Access VectorAccess ComplexityAuthenticationConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Access Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocal
Access Complexity
LowMediumHigh
Authentication
NoneSingleMultiple
Confidentiality Impact
CompletePartialNone
Integrity Impact
CompletePartialNone
Availability Impact
CompletePartialNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SangforOperation and Maintenance Security Management System3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, 3.0.6, 3.0.7, 3.0.8, 3.0.9, 3.0.10, 3.0.11, 3.0.12Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-74 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.