Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-1412 is a remote command injection issue in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.12. An unauthenticated network attacker may be able to run system commands through a vulnerable HTTP POST handler. Public exploit information is reported, but CISA KEV listing is not indicated in the provided sources.
Executive priority
Prioritize review within the current remediation cycle, and faster for internet-facing or broadly reachable systems. The issue permits remote command injection without authentication and has public exploit information, but the provided sources do not confirm active exploitation or name a vendor patch.
Technical view
The flaw affects /fort/audit/get_clip_img in the HTTP POST request handler. Manipulation of the frame/dirno argument can lead to command injection. The CVSS v2 score is 7.5 with network access, low complexity, and no authentication required. CWE mappings include CWE-74 and CWE-77.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System 3.0.0 through 3.0.12, especially if the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks.
Exploitation context
The source bundle states the exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be used. It does not show CISA KEV status or confirmed active exploitation. Treat internet-exposed instances as urgent because exploitation requires remote network access and no authentication per the CVSS vector.
Researcher notes
Evidence comes mainly from VulDB and CVE metadata. The affected function is described as unknown within /fort/audit/get_clip_img, with frame/dirno as the injection-related argument. A GitHub issue is referenced as exploit-related, but the source bundle marks it broken-link; verify independently before relying on it.
Mitigation direction
- Identify whether Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System is deployed.
- Determine if versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.12 are in use.
- Restrict access to the management interface to trusted networks only.
- Check Sangfor and VulDB guidance for patches or official mitigations.
- Monitor for suspicious access to /fort/audit/get_clip_img.
Validation and detection
- Inventory Sangfor OSM instances and record exact versions.
- Review network exposure of the HTTP management interface.
- Check logs for requests to /fort/audit/get_clip_img.
- Confirm whether vendor updates or advisories apply to your deployed version.
- Validate compensating controls block untrusted access.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-1412 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.5 (2.0)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR106.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 2.0 score
7.5HighVector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- VDB-342801 | Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System HTTP POST Request get_clip_img command injectionCVE reference · vdb-entry, technical-description
- VDB-342801 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)CVE reference · signature, permissions-required
- Submit #736513 | Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System (OSM / 运维安全管理系统) v3.0.12 Command InjectionaCVE reference · third-party-advisory
- https://github.com/LX-LX88/cve/issues/22CVE reference · broken-link, exploit
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.