LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1394: WP Quick Contact Us <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The WP Quick Contact Us plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1394 affects the WP Quick Contact Us WordPress plugin through version 1.0. A malicious site or link could trick a logged-in administrator into unintentionally changing the plugin’s settings. This is not a server takeover issue, but it can cause unauthorized configuration changes that may affect site integrity.

Executive priority

Treat as a routine but timely WordPress plugin risk. Prioritize sites where administrators frequently manage content or where contact-form settings affect business workflows. No evidence provided indicates mass exploitation or critical impact.

Technical view

The issue is a cross-site request forgery vulnerability caused by missing nonce validation in the plugin settings update functionality. Wordfence rates it CVSS 4.3. Exploitation requires user interaction by a site administrator and enables unauthenticated attackers to submit forged settings changes. The cited WordPress Trac lines show the relevant plugin code location.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running WP Quick Contact Us versions up to and including 1.0. Sites without this plugin are not affected. Administrative users must be authenticated and tricked into taking an action for exploitation to succeed.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The attack depends on social engineering an administrator into clicking a crafted link or otherwise triggering a forged request while logged in.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports CWE-352 CSRF in settings update handling due to missing nonce validation. Impact is integrity-only and requires administrator interaction. No exploit details, patch version, or active exploitation claims are provided in the supplied sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Check vendor and WordPress plugin guidance for an updated or corrected release.
  • Disable or remove WP Quick Contact Us if it is not business-critical.
  • Limit WordPress administrator access to trusted users only.
  • Warn administrators not to click untrusted links while logged into WordPress.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for WP Quick Contact Us installations.
  • Confirm whether installed versions are 1.0 or earlier.
  • Review plugin settings for unexpected changes.
  • Check vendor references for nonce validation or security updates.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1394 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1394Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
dmitritechsWP Quick Contact Us0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.