LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1392: SR WP Minify HTML <= 2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1392 affects the SR WP Minify HTML WordPress plugin. A malicious site or link could trick a logged-in administrator into changing plugin settings. The issue requires administrator interaction and is rated medium, with limited integrity impact. No provided source says it is being actively exploited.

Executive priority

Treat as routine but real website hygiene work. Prioritize internet-facing WordPress sites where many administrators manage content. This does not warrant emergency response unless the plugin is widely deployed or settings changes could disrupt business pages.

Technical view

The vulnerability is a CSRF issue caused by missing nonce validation in sr_minify_html_theme(). The CVE description says all versions up to and including 2.1 are vulnerable. Attackers do not need authentication, but they must induce a site administrator to perform an action such as clicking a link. CVSS is 4.3, vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites using SR WP Minify HTML, especially versions up to and including 2.1 per the CVE description. The bundled affected metadata appears incomplete or inconsistent, so vulnerability managers should verify installed plugin versions directly.

Exploitation context

This is not a hands-off remote compromise. It depends on social engineering a logged-in administrator and affects plugin setting integrity. The source bundle states KEV is false, and no cited source reports active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports CSRF to settings update through missing nonce validation. No exploit-in-the-wild source or fixed version is provided. The affected-product metadata conflicts with the prose description, so confirm scope from vendor or repository updates before making broad claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for SR WP Minify HTML and installed version.
  • If present and not needed, disable or remove the plugin.
  • Check Wordfence, CVE, and WordPress plugin sources for vendor remediation guidance.
  • Limit administrator browsing and email activity while logged into WordPress.
  • Review plugin settings for unauthorized or unexpected changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether SR WP Minify HTML is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record plugin version and compare against the CVE description through version 2.1.
  • Review administrative activity around any plugin setting changes.
  • Check the referenced plugin code for nonce validation status.
  • Monitor vendor and Wordfence pages for updated fixed-version information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1392 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1392Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
superrishiSR WP Minify HTML0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.