CVE-2026-13059: Improper Validation of Client-Supplied Command Parameters Allowing Role-Based Access Control Bypass
An authenticated user with low privileges may be able to perform unauthorized reads and writes on data protected by role-based query-level access controls, due to insufficient validation of certain client-supplied command parameters. The issue affects find, update, delete, and aggregate commands in non-apiStrict configurations.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A low-privileged MongoDB user may bypass query-level role restrictions and read or change protected data. The flaw affects specified MongoDB Server versions when API strict mode is not configured. Because exploitation requires an authenticated account, compromised credentials, exposed application accounts, or malicious insiders are the principal business concerns.
Executive priority
Prioritize assessment within days, accelerating for internet-reachable databases, sensitive data, shared application credentials, or insider-risk concerns. Treat confirmed vulnerable non-apiStrict deployments as urgent because successful abuse could expose or alter protected data without disrupting service or requiring victim interaction.
Technical view
Insufficient validation of client-supplied parameters can bypass role-based query-level controls in find, update, delete, and aggregate commands. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.6: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact but no stated availability impact.
Likely exposure
Potential exposure is limited to the listed MongoDB Server versions—7.0, 8.0, 8.2.0, and 8.3.0—using non-apiStrict configurations and query-level RBAC. The supplied affected-data also states a default status of unaffected, creating scope ambiguity that administrators should resolve through MongoDB guidance.
Exploitation context
The supplied record is not in CISA KEV and cites no evidence of active exploitation. Abuse nevertheless appears practical for an authenticated, low-privileged user because the stated attack has network reachability, low complexity, and requires no user interaction. Public exploit availability is not established by the sources.
Researcher notes
CWE-807 is assigned. Important missing evidence includes precise vulnerable patch ranges, fixed versions, whether apiStrict is a complete mitigation, and exploitation telemetry. The affected-version list and default-unaffected status appear potentially inconsistent; avoid extrapolating broader version ranges until MongoDB clarifies them.
Mitigation direction
Review MongoDB's advisory ticket for confirmed affected builds, fixed releases, and vendor-approved remediation.
Evaluate enabling apiStrict where application compatibility and MongoDB guidance permit.
Restrict network access to MongoDB and remove unnecessary low-privileged accounts.
Rotate credentials suspected of compromise and review application account permissions.
Validation and detection
Inventory MongoDB Server versions and identify 7.0, 8.0, 8.2.0, or 8.3.0 deployments.
Determine whether each relevant deployment uses apiStrict and query-level role controls.
Review logs for unexpected protected-data reads or writes by low-privileged identities.
After remediation, verify role restrictions across find, update, delete, and aggregate operations in an authorized test environment.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-807: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.