Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-12222: Yealink SIP-T46U Web FastCGI Service bttest mod_webd.BlueToothTest stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was determined in Yealink SIP-T46U 108.86.0.118. Affected is the function mod_webd.BlueToothTest of the file /api/inner/bttest of the component Web FastCGI Service. Executing a manipulation of the argument btMac/pin/reserved can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be done within the local network. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take high

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-12222 affects Yealink SIP-T46U phones running version 108.86.0.118. A local-network attacker with low privileges could trigger a memory corruption flaw in a web service endpoint. Public exploit material is reported, but CISA KEV is not listed and the sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority network containment and vendor-follow-up item, especially in environments with Yealink SIP-T46U phones. The main business risk is compromise or disruption of voice devices from inside the network. Immediate action should focus on inventory, segmentation, access restriction, and monitoring until vendor guidance is available.

Technical view

The issue is a stack-based buffer overflow in mod_webd.BlueToothTest within /api/inner/bttest of the Web FastCGI Service. Manipulation of btMac, pin, or reserved can impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVSS 4.0 is 8.6 with adjacent-network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to Yealink SIP-T46U devices on firmware 108.86.0.118 where the web service is reachable from the local or adjacent network. Internet exposure is not stated in the sources. Organizations with flat voice networks, shared LAN access, or weak device-management segmentation have higher practical risk.

Exploitation context

VulDB states the exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The source bundle does not prove active exploitation, and KEV is false. The attacker needs local-network access and low privileges, reducing broad internet-scale risk but increasing concern for compromised internal networks or untrusted LAN segments.

Researcher notes

Evidence is currently third-party advisory driven. Vendor contact reportedly received no response, and no official fix is named in the provided sources. Avoid assuming broader Yealink model impact beyond SIP-T46U 108.86.0.118. Public exploit disclosure raises urgency, but active exploitation is not established.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Yealink support channels for firmware or mitigation guidance.
  • Apply a vendor-provided update if one becomes available.
  • Restrict phone web management access to trusted admin hosts.
  • Segment voice devices from user and guest networks.
  • Block unnecessary access to the affected web service where feasible.
  • Monitor for suspicious access to /api/inner/bttest.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Yealink SIP-T46U devices and record firmware versions.
  • Prioritize devices running firmware 108.86.0.118.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not reachable from untrusted LAN segments.
  • Review logs for unexpected /api/inner/bttest access.
  • Track CVE, VulDB, and Yealink updates for patch information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-12222 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
0 ADP providers
6 Source links

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
8.6 CVSS 4.0 High CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB
8 CVSS 3.1 High CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 2.1 5.9 VulDB
8 CVSS 3.0 High CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 2.1 5.9 VulDB
7.7 CVSS 2.0 High AV:A/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 5.1 10 VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6 High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-12222 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
Yealink SIP-T46U 108.86.0.118 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.