Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-12200: Ritlabs TinyWeb Server Header libeay32.dll.html stack-based overflow

A security vulnerability has been detected in Ritlabs TinyWeb Server up to 1.94 on Win32. This impacts an unknown function in the library libeay32.dll.html of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument Authorization leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take high

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-12200 is a remotely reachable buffer overflow in Ritlabs TinyWeb Server for Win32 through version 1.94. A malicious Authorization header can crash or potentially compromise the service. Public exploit information is referenced, but the provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation or a vendor fix.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority exposure reduction item for any reachable TinyWeb deployment. Public exploit information and no named vendor fix increase operational risk. Prioritize removing, replacing, or isolating affected services rather than waiting for confirmed exploitation.

Technical view

The issue affects TinyWeb Server’s Header Handler, specifically handling of the Authorization argument in libeay32.dll.html. VulDB describes a stack-based buffer overflow with network attack vector, low complexity, no authentication, and partial confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. CVSS v2 is 7.5. CWE mappings include CWE-119 and CWE-121.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Ritlabs TinyWeb Server 1.94 or earlier runs on Win32 and accepts untrusted HTTP traffic. Internet-facing deployments are higher risk. Internal-only services still matter if reachable by untrusted users, compromised hosts, or shared networks.

Exploitation context

The source bundle states the exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be used, with exploitability marked as proof-of-concept. KEV is false, and no cited source confirms active exploitation in the wild. Vendor contact reportedly received no response.

Researcher notes

Evidence is largely from VulDB and the CVE record. The vulnerable function is described as unknown, and the vendor reportedly did not respond. The public exploit reference should be reviewed defensively, but avoid reproducing it on production systems.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Ritlabs TinyWeb Server deployments, especially Win32 versions 1.94 and earlier.
  • Remove or replace TinyWeb Server where business need is low.
  • Restrict network access to trusted clients only.
  • Place affected services behind filtering controls where feasible.
  • Monitor vendor and CVE sources for official guidance or updates.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts for Ritlabs TinyWeb Server and recorded version.
  • Confirm whether the service is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks.
  • Review web logs for unusual Authorization header activity.
  • Check vulnerability scanners for CVE-2026-12200 coverage.
  • Document compensating controls if no patch is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-12200 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
0 ADP providers
6 Source links

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
7.5 CVSS 2.0 High AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 10 6.4 VulDB
7.3 CVSS 3.1 High CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 3.9 3.4 VulDB
7.3 CVSS 3.0 High CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 3.9 3.4 VulDB
6.9 CVSS 4.0 Medium CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9 Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-12200 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
Ritlabs TinyWeb Server 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, 1.13, 1.14, 1.15, 1.16, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, 1.20, 1.21, 1.22, 1.23, 1.24, 1.25, 1.26, 1.27, 1.28, 1.29, 1.30, 1.31, 1.32, 1.33, 1.34, 1.35, 1.36, 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, 1.40, 1.41, 1.42, 1.43, 1.44, 1.45, 1.46, 1.47, 1.48, 1.49, 1.50, 1.51, 1.52, 1.53, 1.54, 1.55, 1.56, 1.57, 1.58, 1.59, 1.60, 1.61, 1.62, 1.63, 1.64, 1.65, 1.66, 1.67, 1.68, 1.69, 1.70, 1.71, 1.72, 1.73, 1.74, 1.75, 1.76, 1.77, 1.78, 1.79, 1.80, 1.81, 1.82, 1.83, 1.84, 1.85, 1.86, 1.87, 1.88, 1.89, 1.90, 1.91, 1.92, 1.93, 1.94 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.