LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1215: MMA Call Tracking <= 2.3.15 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update

The MMA Call Tracking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.15. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving plugin configuration on the `mma_call_tracking_menu` admin page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify call tracking configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1215 affects the MMA Call Tracking WordPress plugin through version 2.3.15. If an administrator is tricked into clicking a malicious link or visiting a crafted page while logged in, plugin call tracking settings could be changed. This is an integrity issue, not a direct data theft or site takeover issue based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin issue. It is not reported as actively exploited, and impact appears limited to settings manipulation. Prioritize affected public websites, marketing sites relying on call tracking accuracy, and environments where many administrators manage WordPress from email-linked workflows.

Technical view

The plugin’s `mma_call_tracking_menu` admin settings save path lacks nonce validation, creating a CSRF vulnerability. The CVSS v3.1 score is 4.3, with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and required user interaction. Impact is limited to low integrity modification of plugin configuration settings.

Likely exposure

WordPress sites using MMA Call Tracking versions up to and including 2.3.15 are the relevant exposure. The attacker does not need WordPress credentials, but must induce a logged-in administrator to perform an action. Sites not using this plugin are not affected by this CVE.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation depends on social engineering of an authenticated administrator and would target configuration changes rather than confidentiality or availability. Risk is higher where administrators browse email or external sites while logged into WordPress.

Researcher notes

Sources identify missing nonce validation in the plugin settings save flow on `mma_call_tracking_menu`. The public record states affected versions through 2.3.15, but the supplied affected metadata is sparse. No official patch version is identified in the provided bundle, so remediation status should be confirmed with vendor or repository data.

Mitigation direction

  • Check whether MMA Call Tracking is installed and identify its version.
  • Review vendor or WordPress plugin guidance for a patched version or official mitigation.
  • Update the plugin if a fixed version is available from the vendor.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Limit WordPress administrator sessions and avoid browsing untrusted links while logged in.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the MMA Call Tracking plugin.
  • Confirm whether installed versions are 2.3.15 or earlier.
  • Review plugin settings for unauthorized call tracking configuration changes.
  • Check administrative access logs for suspicious timing around settings changes.
  • Monitor vendor, Wordfence, and WordPress plugin repository updates for remediation status.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1215 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1215Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
messagemetricMMA Call Tracking0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.