Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-1153 is a medium-severity cross-site request forgery issue in technical-laohu mpay versions 1.2.0 through 1.2.4. An attacker could trick a logged-in user into taking an unintended action in mpay. The disclosed impact is limited integrity impact, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
Executive priority
Treat this as a near-term remediation item if mpay is used for payment or administrative workflows. The issue is not currently KEV-listed, but public exploit information raises urgency. Prioritize asset identification, version confirmation, and vendor guidance review.
Technical view
The CVE describes CSRF in an unknown function of technical-laohu mpay up to 1.2.4, mapped to CWE-352 and CWE-862. CVSS 4.0 is 5.3: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, low vulnerable-system integrity impact. Public exploit material is referenced by VulDB and GitHub.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to organizations running technical-laohu mpay versions 1.2.0, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, or 1.2.4. The sources do not identify specific deployments, default configurations, affected endpoints, or whether internet exposure is common.
Exploitation context
Remote exploitation is described as possible, but user interaction is required. The source bundle says exploit material is public. There is no KEV listing and no cited source in the bundle confirms active exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
The public record lacks key technical detail: affected function, exact request surface, and vendor fix status are not provided in the bundle. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the CVSS and VulDB statements. Validate exposure through version inventory and official project information before risk acceptance.
Mitigation direction
- Identify whether technical-laohu mpay is used in your environment.
- Determine if deployed versions are 1.2.0 through 1.2.4.
- Check the project or vendor channels for fixed versions or official mitigations.
- Restrict access to mpay administrative or sensitive workflows where practical.
- Educate users to avoid unsolicited links while remediation is pending.
Validation and detection
- Inventory mpay deployments and record version numbers.
- Compare discovered versions against 1.2.0 through 1.2.4.
- Review vendor advisories and referenced issue pages for remediation updates.
- Check application logs for unexpected state-changing requests tied to user sessions.
- Verify compensating access controls around sensitive mpay functions.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCWE-862: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup
Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-1153 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.3 (4.0)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 4.0 score
5.3MediumVector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- VDB-341746 | technical-laohu mpay cross-site request forgeryCVE reference · vdb-entry, technical-description
- VDB-341746 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC)CVE reference · signature, permissions-required
- Submit #735789 | https://gitee.com/technical-laohu/mpay mpay v1.2.4 Cross-Site Request ForgeryCVE reference · third-party-advisory
- https://github.com/bdkuzma/vuln/issues/18CVE reference · exploit, issue-tracking
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Missing Authorization
Missing Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.