Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-1110 is a buffer overflow in cijliu librtsp, a library for RTSP handling. The reported attack requires local access and low privileges, so urgency is lower than internet-exposed flaws. Impact may include limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss where affected code is used.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate-priority engineering follow-up. It is not reported as remotely exploitable or actively exploited, but affected embedded uses should be identified because no confirmed vendor fix is named.
Technical view
The flaw affects rtsp_parse_method in cijliu librtsp up to commit 2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04. It is categorized as CWE-119/CWE-120 buffer overflow. CVSS 3.1 is 5.3 with AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L. Sources report rolling releases and no clear fixed version.
Likely exposure
Organizations are exposed if they build, package, or embed cijliu librtsp at or before the named commit. Exposure appears local-host only, requiring an attacker to already have low-privileged local access.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not indicate CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. VulDB lists exploit maturity as proof-of-concept in the CVSS vector, but no source here supports active in-the-wild attacks.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to CVE/VulDB-style reporting and a related GitHub write-up. The vendor reportedly did not respond, and rolling releases prevent clear affected/fixed version boundaries. Avoid assuming downstream products are affected without dependency evidence.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory software and firmware that embeds cijliu librtsp.
- Check whether builds include commit 2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04 or earlier.
- Monitor upstream and CVE/VulDB entries for a confirmed fixed release.
- Restrict local access to systems using affected builds.
- Consider disabling or replacing affected RTSP parsing functionality where feasible.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether librtsp is present in source, packages, containers, or firmware.
- Identify the exact commit or snapshot used in each build.
- Review whether local users can reach rtsp_parse_method through exposed workflows.
- Track vendor or maintainer response for fixed commit details.
- Prioritize systems where local users are untrusted or multi-tenant.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCWE-120: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-1110 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.3 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R1.83.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
5.3MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- VDB-341702 | cijliu librtsp rtsp_parse_method buffer overflowCVE reference · vdb-entry, technical-description
- VDB-341702 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)CVE reference · signature, permissions-required
- Submit #732603 | librtsp demo git-master-2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04 Buffer OverflowCVE reference · third-party-advisory
- https://github.com/fizz-is-on-the-way/vuls_protocol/blob/main/librtsp_rtsp_parse_method/librtsp_rtsp_parse_method.mdCVE reference · related
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.