LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1109: cijliu librtsp rtsp_parse_request buffer overflow

A vulnerability was detected in cijliu librtsp up to 2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04. The impacted element is the function rtsp_parse_request. The manipulation results in buffer overflow. Attacking locally is a requirement. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1109 is a buffer overflow in cijliu librtsp’s RTSP request parsing function. The reported attack path requires local access and low privileges, so this is not described as a remote internet-facing issue. Business urgency is moderate unless librtsp is embedded in sensitive media, surveillance, or device software where local code paths are reachable.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority dependency exposure review. It does not warrant emergency internet-wide response based on current sources, but it should be triaged where librtsp is embedded in products handling media streams, especially appliances or multi-user environments with weak local isolation.

Technical view

The issue affects rtsp_parse_request in cijliu librtsp up to commit 2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04. VulDB describes a buffer overflow caused by manipulated input, mapped to CWE-119 and CWE-120. CVSS 3.1 is 5.3 with AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L. Release-based affected and fixed version details are unavailable.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to systems that build, package, or embed cijliu librtsp and allow a local low-privileged user or process to reach RTSP request parsing. Organizations should check firmware, media applications, internal tools, and vendor-supplied components for this library or the cited commit lineage.

Exploitation context

The sources indicate proof-of-concept maturity in the CVSS exploitability field, but do not show confirmed active exploitation. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Local access is required, reducing broad external exposure but preserving risk on shared systems, appliances, and compromised endpoints.

Researcher notes

Public details identify the vulnerable function and commit-level scope, but vendor response and fixed-version information are missing. Avoid assuming all RTSP products are affected. Focus on component provenance, reachability of rtsp_parse_request, local privilege context, and whether downstream vendors have patched or forked the library.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications, firmware, and builds that include cijliu librtsp.
  • Check upstream project and vendor channels for an advisory or corrected commit.
  • Limit local user access on systems running affected librtsp-dependent software.
  • Rebuild or replace affected components when trustworthy vendor guidance becomes available.
  • Monitor security feeds for updated affected-version and remediation details.

Validation and detection

  • Search SBOMs, dependency manifests, and source trees for cijliu librtsp.
  • Identify builds based on or near commit 2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04.
  • Confirm whether rtsp_parse_request is compiled and reachable in deployed products.
  • Review local privilege boundaries around services using the library.
  • Track CVE and VulDB records for revised exploitability or fix information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1109 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R1.83.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1109Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
cijliulibrtsp2ec1a81ad65280568a0c7c16420d7c10fde13b04Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.