LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-1070: Alex User Counter <= 6.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The Alex User Counter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alex_user_counter_function() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-1070 affects the Alex User Counter WordPress plugin through version 6.0. A malicious website or link could trick a logged-in site administrator into changing plugin settings. The issue requires administrator interaction and does not directly expose data or disrupt availability, so urgency is moderate.

Executive priority

Treat as a routine but real WordPress hardening item. Prioritize sites where administrators frequently manage WordPress from normal browsing sessions or where plugin settings affect public behavior. No evidence provided indicates active exploitation.

Technical view

The plugin lacks nonce validation in alex_user_counter_function(), creating a CSRF weakness classified as CWE-352. The CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, and low integrity impact only. Sources identify versions up to and including 6.0 as vulnerable.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites using Alex User Counter version 6.0 or earlier, where an administrator can be induced to interact with attacker-controlled content while authenticated.

Exploitation context

The CVE record and Wordfence description indicate exploitation requires tricking a site administrator into taking an action such as clicking a link. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Public references point to missing nonce validation around alex_user_counter_function() and WordPress Trac source locations. The source bundle has an affected-version metadata inconsistency, but the narrative states all versions up to and including 6.0 are vulnerable.

Mitigation direction

  • Check whether Alex User Counter is installed and its version is 6.0 or earlier.
  • Review Wordfence and WordPress plugin guidance for any vendor-provided update or remediation.
  • Restrict administrator browsing and avoid clicking untrusted links while logged into WordPress.
  • Consider disabling the plugin if no trusted remediation is available and business impact is acceptable.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Alex User Counter plugin.
  • Confirm installed plugin versions against the vulnerable range through 6.0.
  • Review plugin code or vendor notes for nonce validation in the settings update path.
  • Check change logs and administrative settings for unexpected plugin configuration changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-1070 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-1070Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
adzbierajewskiAlex User Counter0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.