LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-10199: Assimp glTF2Asset.h LazyDict null pointer dereference

A vulnerability has been found in Assimp up to 6.0.4. Affected by this issue is the function glTF2::LazyDict in the library glTF2Asset.h. Such manipulation of the argument operator[] leads to null pointer dereference. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is d24b85319bd70c65883a2b96613e07e23fb95981. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.

MediumCVSS 4.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Assimp, a 3D asset import library, can crash in vulnerable versions when local low-privileged access reaches the affected glTF2 LazyDict code path. The documented impact is limited availability loss, not data theft or code execution. Treat it as a stability and service-resilience issue where Assimp processes untrusted or user-supplied assets.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for systems that import untrusted 3D assets or run Assimp in shared processing environments. This is not currently evidenced as actively exploited or code-execution capable, but public exploit disclosure raises urgency for exposed asset-processing workflows.

Technical view

CVE-2026-10199 is a null pointer dereference in glTF2::LazyDict in glTF2Asset.h, triggered through operator[] argument handling. Sources list Assimp 6.0.0 through 6.0.4 as affected, with CWE-404 and CWE-476. CVSS 4.0 is 4.8, local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, and low vulnerable-system availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in applications, pipelines, or services embedding Assimp 6.0.0-6.0.4 and processing local or user-controlled glTF assets. Systems not using Assimp, not using affected versions, or not allowing untrusted asset processing have lower exposure.

Exploitation context

The bundle says exploitation is local and that exploit details have been publicly disclosed. KEV is false, and no cited source establishes active exploitation in the wild. The expected outcome is a crash or availability degradation, not confirmed confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Researcher notes

The record is narrow: affected function, versions, CVSS vector, public disclosure, and patch commit are identified. Available evidence supports denial of service via null dereference only. Do not infer remote reachability unless a specific product exposes Assimp processing to remote file submission.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade or patch Assimp using vendor guidance and commit d24b85319bd70c65883a2b96613e07e23fb95981.
  • Identify applications and build dependencies embedding Assimp 6.0.0 through 6.0.4.
  • Restrict processing of untrusted glTF assets until patched.
  • Isolate asset-conversion jobs from critical services where practical.
  • Monitor upstream Assimp issue and pull request status for release guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed Assimp versions in packages, source builds, containers, and bundled applications.
  • Check whether glTF processing is reachable by local users or user-supplied files.
  • Verify the patch commit or an upstream fixed release is present.
  • Run existing unit and regression tests for asset import workflows after updating.
  • Review crash logs for unexplained Assimp glTF processing failures.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-404: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-476: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-10199 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.8CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB
3.3CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C1.81.4VulDB
3.3CVSS 3.0LowCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C1.81.4VulDB
1.7CVSS 2.0LowAV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C3.12.9VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

4.8Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-10199Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aAssimp6.0.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 6.0.3, 6.0.4Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-404 · source CWE mapping

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-476 · source CWE mapping

NULL Pointer Dereference

NULL Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.