CVE-2026-10196: Mail Mint <= 1.31.0 - Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Arbitrary Form Fields
The Mail Mint – Email Marketing, Newsletter, Email Automation & WooCommerce Emails plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.31.0 via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'handle_form_submission' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. The additional presence of a POP chain allows attackers to execute code on the server. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 1.23.1.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
An internet attacker could submit malicious data through Mail Mint forms and potentially take control of the WordPress server without logging in. Successful exploitation could expose customer data, alter website content, disrupt service, or enable further compromise. The supplied record says versions through 1.31.0 are affected and that an earlier fix was incomplete.
Executive priority
Treat this as an emergency exposure check for internet-facing WordPress systems. Prioritize identifying affected installations, limiting public access, and applying a vendor-confirmed complete remediation. Because code execution could compromise the entire server, exposed systems warrant investigation even though active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence.
Technical view
Mail Mint through 1.31.0 deserializes untrusted input in handle_form_submission, enabling unauthenticated PHP object injection through arbitrary form fields. The reported presence of a suitable POP chain can turn object injection into server-side code execution. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, reflecting network access, low complexity, and no required privileges or user interaction.
Likely exposure
WordPress sites running Mail Mint 1.31.0 or earlier should be considered potentially exposed, particularly when form submission functionality is reachable by unauthenticated visitors. The bundle does not establish whether every installation exposes a usable form or POP chain configuration, so site-specific validation remains necessary.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources describe unauthenticated remote code execution potential, but provide no evidence of active exploitation. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Exploit attempts may be difficult to distinguish from ordinary form traffic without application, web-server, and host-level monitoring.
Researcher notes
The source bundle contains inconsistent affected-product metadata: its narrative says all versions through 1.31.0, while the structured affected entry lists version “0” with a default unaffected status. The narrative also says 1.23.1 was only partially patched but names no fully fixed release. These gaps reduce certainty about precise version boundaries and remediation status.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites and identify every installed Mail Mint version.
Check current vendor guidance for a release confirmed to fully remediate CVE-2026-10196.
Disable Mail Mint or restrict affected form functionality until a complete vendor-confirmed fix is applied.
Back up affected systems before updating, then apply the confirmed remediation promptly.
Increase monitoring for anomalous form submissions and unexpected server-side changes.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether each site runs Mail Mint 1.31.0 or earlier.
Determine whether Mail Mint forms accept submissions from unauthenticated users.
Verify the deployed release is vendor-confirmed as fully fixed, not merely the partial 1.23.1 patch.
Review web, WordPress, and host logs for unusual form activity or unexpected changes.
After remediation, confirm forms operate normally and the vulnerable version is absent.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-502: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
10Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-502 · source CWE mapping
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Deserialization of Untrusted Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.