LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-10180: TRENDnet TEW-432BRP formSysCmd command injection

A vulnerability has been found in TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20. Impacted is the function formSysCmd of the file /goform/formSysCmd. Such manipulation of the argument sysCmd leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor explains: "This product has been EOL for 15 years (since 2009). As the item has been EOL for such a long time, we are not able to replicate or fix any vulnerabilities." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-10180 affects an obsolete TRENDnet TEW-432BRP router firmware release. A remote authenticated user could abuse a system-command form handler to run commands on the device. TRENDnet says the product has been end-of-life since 2009 and cannot be fixed.

Executive priority

Prioritize replacement or isolation if these routers exist in production. The main business risk is an unsupported edge device with public exploit information and no vendor fix, not broad enterprise software exposure.

Technical view

The issue is command injection in /goform/formSysCmd through the sysCmd argument on TRENDnet TEW-432BRP 3.10B20. CVSS v2 is 6.5 with network access, low complexity, and single authentication required. Public exploit material is referenced, but KEV is false.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations still running TEW-432BRP 3.10B20, especially where the router management interface is reachable from untrusted networks. The product is unsupported, so normal patch remediation is not available.

Exploitation context

Sources state the attack can be launched remotely and that exploit details have been publicly disclosed. The provided CVSS vector indicates authentication is required. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation in the wild or CISA KEV listing.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for affected product, endpoint, parameter, public disclosure, and EOL status. The bundle does not prove unauthenticated exploitation, active exploitation, or a vendor patch. Validate exposure before escalating beyond device replacement and access control.

Mitigation direction

  • Replace any TEW-432BRP devices with supported hardware.
  • Remove management interfaces from internet or untrusted network reachability.
  • Restrict administrative access to trusted management networks only.
  • Review vendor guidance, but expect no firmware fix for this EOL product.
  • Treat remaining use as an accepted risk requiring compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory networks for TRENDnet TEW-432BRP devices and firmware 3.10B20.
  • Confirm whether management interfaces are exposed beyond trusted administrators.
  • Review logs for requests to /goform/formSysCmd or unusual administrative activity.
  • Verify device replacement or isolation after remediation.
  • Record any unsupported devices in the risk register.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-10180 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR86.4VulDB
6.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.83.4VulDB
6.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.83.4VulDB
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-10180Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TRENDnetTEW-432BRP3.10B20Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-74 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.