LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-0967: Libssh: libssh: denial of service via inefficient regular expression processing

A flaw was found in libssh. A remote attacker, by controlling client configuration files or known_hosts files, could craft specific hostnames that when processed by the `match_pattern()` function can lead to inefficient regular expression backtracking. This can cause timeouts and resource exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the client.

LowCVSS 2.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-0967 can make a libssh-based client consume excessive processing time and resources when it handles a specially crafted hostname. Successful abuse can disrupt client availability, but requires influence over client configuration or known_hosts data and user interaction. The supplied assessment rates it low severity at CVSS 2.2.

Executive priority

Treat this as routine, targeted remediation rather than an emergency. Patch through normal vulnerability-management cycles, accelerating systems that ingest untrusted SSH configuration or known_hosts data. Business impact is limited to client availability in the supplied evidence, with no documented data theft, modification, or active exploitation.

Technical view

The flaw is inefficient regular-expression backtracking (CWE-1333) in libssh’s match_pattern() processing. Crafted hostnames can trigger timeouts or resource exhaustion. The supplied vector is local, high complexity, low privileges, and user interaction required, with availability impact only. Confidentiality and integrity impacts are not identified.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where affected libssh packages process attacker-influenced client configuration or known_hosts entries. The bundle identifies RHEL 8, 9, and 10 packages and OpenShift 4 RHEL CoreOS components as affected. Listed RHEL 6 and 7 libssh2 packages and Red Hat Hardened Images are unaffected.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires control or influence over configuration or known_hosts content containing crafted hostnames; ordinary remote network reachability alone is not described as sufficient.

Researcher notes

The source bundle identifies match_pattern() as the affected function and CWE-1333 as the weakness. Exact triggering patterns, fixed downstream package versions, and observed exploitation are not provided. RHEL 9 appears twice with identical package and CPE data, which looks duplicative rather than evidence of separate exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the applicable Red Hat advisories and install vendor-provided corrected packages.
  • Prioritize systems processing client configuration or known_hosts data from untrusted or externally influenced sources.
  • Restrict modification and distribution of SSH client configuration and known_hosts files.
  • Follow upstream libssh and Red Hat guidance where an applicable fixed package is not yet identified.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory libssh packages across RHEL 8, 9, 10, and OpenShift 4 environments.
  • Compare installed package releases with RHSA-2026:18160 and RHSA-2026:18683 applicability and remediation details.
  • Identify workflows importing or generating SSH configuration and known_hosts data from untrusted sources.
  • Confirm updated systems no longer contain vendor-designated vulnerable package builds.
  • Monitor affected clients for unusual timeouts or resource exhaustion during hostname pattern processing.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1333: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-0967 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.2 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.2CVSS 3.0LowCVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L0.81.4redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

2.2Low
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-0967Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libssh, 0:0.12.0-2.el10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libssh, 0:0.10.4-18.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libssh, 0:0.10.4-18.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libssh2unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libssh2unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsshaffected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imageslibssh2unaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8affected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1333 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.