LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-0871: Org.keycloak/keycloak-services: keycloak: unauthorized modification of unmanaged user attributes by administrators

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-users` permission can bypass the "Only administrators can view" setting for unmanaged attributes, allowing them to modify these attributes. This improper access control can lead to unauthorized changes to user profiles, even when the system is configured to restrict such modifications.

MediumCVSS 4.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-0871 is an access-control flaw in Keycloak-related Red Hat products. A highly privileged administrator with manage-users permission can change unmanaged user attributes even when configuration says those attributes should only be viewable by administrators. The main business risk is unauthorized profile integrity changes inside identity systems, not public remote takeover.

Executive priority

Treat as a medium-priority identity governance issue. It is not described as actively exploited and needs high privileges, but it affects identity data integrity. Prioritize if your organization uses delegated administrators, stores sensitive business attributes in user profiles, or relies on attribute controls for compliance workflows.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-266 improper privilege/access control. Red Hat describes a bypass of the “Only administrators can view” setting for unmanaged attributes by administrators holding manage-users. CVSS is 4.9, network reachable, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, with high integrity impact and no confidentiality or availability impact stated.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments using affected Red Hat Keycloak builds or packages listed by Red Hat, including Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 packages and keycloak-services in listed Red Hat products. It requires an authenticated administrator with manage-users permission, so insider risk, delegated admin models, and compromised admin accounts matter most.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not indicate active exploitation, and CISA KEV status is false. Exploitation requires high privileges, reducing broad internet risk. The realistic scenario is abuse by an over-privileged, malicious, or compromised administrator to alter user profile data despite attribute visibility restrictions.

Researcher notes

Key unknowns from the provided bundle include exact upstream Keycloak version ranges and detailed fixed package versions beyond Red Hat’s affected/unaffected product entries. Avoid assuming community Keycloak exposure unless confirmed by vendor data. Focus validation on role-based permissions, unmanaged attribute configuration, and Red Hat package provenance.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Red Hat advisories RHSA-2026:2365 and RHSA-2026:2366 for applicable updates.
  • Upgrade affected Red Hat packages to vendor-designated fixed or unaffected versions.
  • Audit who has manage-users permission in each Keycloak realm.
  • Reduce delegated admin permissions where business need is not clear.
  • Monitor user attribute changes until updates and permission reviews are complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Keycloak, Red Hat build of Keycloak, RH-SSO, and JBoss/EAP components.
  • Compare installed packages and versions against Red Hat’s affected product list.
  • Confirm whether unmanaged attributes use the “Only administrators can view” setting.
  • Review admin role assignments for manage-users permission.
  • Check audit logs for unexpected unmanaged user attribute modifications.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-266: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-0871 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N1.23.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-0871Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.4.9-1affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.4-11affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.4-10affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.9rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8keycloak-servicesaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Packkeycloak-servicesaffected
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7keycloak-servicesaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-266 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Privilege Assignment

Incorrect Privilege Assignment represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.