LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-0649: invoiceninja Migration Import Import.php copy server-side request forgery

A security vulnerability has been detected in invoiceninja up to 5.12.38. The affected element is the function copy of the file /app/Jobs/Util/Import.php of the component Migration Import. The manipulation of the argument company_logo leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-0649 is an SSRF issue in Invoice Ninja’s migration import handling through the company_logo value. An authenticated remote user may cause the server to request attacker-controlled locations. Business risk depends on what internal services the Invoice Ninja server can reach. Public proof-of-concept information is reported, but active exploitation is not confirmed.

Executive priority

Treat as a near-term exposure review, not an emergency unless Invoice Ninja can reach sensitive internal systems. Prioritize affected internet-facing or multi-user deployments and apply network containment while waiting for vendor guidance.

Technical view

The issue affects invoiceninja 5.12.0 through 5.12.38 in /app/Jobs/Util/Import.php, function copy, within Migration Import. Manipulating company_logo can trigger server-side request forgery. CVSS v2 is 5.8 with network access, low complexity, and authentication required. CWE-918 applies. Vendor response and fixed-version details are not present in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Self-hosted Invoice Ninja deployments running versions 5.12.0 through 5.12.38 are the known exposure. Risk is higher where migration import is available to users and the server has network access to internal metadata, admin, or intranet services.

Exploitation context

The source bundle states the exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be used, with proof-of-concept status indicated. CISA KEV is false, and no cited source confirms active exploitation in the wild. The CVSS vector indicates authentication is required.

Researcher notes

Evidence is centered on VulDB/CVE data and a referenced public exploit page. The supplied sources do not name a patch, commit, or official vendor advisory. Avoid assuming all Invoice Ninja versions are affected beyond 5.12.0 through 5.12.38.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Invoice Ninja instances and confirm their exact version.
  • Restrict migration import access to trusted administrative users only.
  • Limit outbound network access from Invoice Ninja to required destinations.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for a fixed release or official workaround.
  • If feasible, isolate affected servers from sensitive internal services.

Validation and detection

  • Review asset inventory for Invoice Ninja versions 5.12.0 through 5.12.38.
  • Check whether migration import functionality is enabled and user-accessible.
  • Inspect logs for unusual outbound requests from the Invoice Ninja server.
  • Verify egress controls block access to internal-only services.
  • Track vendor or CVE updates for remediation changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-0649 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR6.46.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 2.0 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 2.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-0649Access VectorAccess ComplexityAuthenticationConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Access Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocal
Access Complexity
LowMediumHigh
Authentication
NoneSingleMultiple
Confidentiality Impact
CompletePartialNone
Integrity Impact
CompletePartialNone
Availability Impact
CompletePartialNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/ainvoiceninja5.12.0, 5.12.1, 5.12.2, 5.12.3, 5.12.4, 5.12.5, 5.12.6, 5.12.7, 5.12.8, 5.12.9, 5.12.10, 5.12.11, 5.12.12, 5.12.13, 5.12.14, 5.12.15, 5.12.16, 5.12.17, 5.12.18, 5.12.19, 5.12.20, 5.12.21, 5.12.22, 5.12.23, 5.12.24, 5.12.25, 5.12.26, 5.12.27, 5.12.28, 5.12.29, 5.12.30, 5.12.31, 5.12.32, 5.12.33, 5.12.34, 5.12.35, 5.12.36, 5.12.37, 5.12.38Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.