CVE-2025-9820: Gnutls: stack-based buffer overflow in gnutls_pkcs11_token_init() function
A flaw was found in the GnuTLS library, specifically in the gnutls_pkcs11_token_init() function that handles PKCS#11 token initialization. When a token label longer than expected is processed, the function writes past the end of a fixed-size stack buffer. This programming error can cause the application using GnuTLS to crash or, in certain conditions, be exploited for code execution. As a result, systems or applications relying on GnuTLS may be vulnerable to a denial of service or local privilege escalation attacks.
Security readout for executives and security teams
CVE-2025-9820 is a GnuTLS memory-safety flaw in PKCS#11 token initialization. A too-long token label can overflow a stack buffer. Most likely impact is application crashes in systems using GnuTLS with PKCS#11 token workflows; sources also note possible code execution or local privilege escalation under certain conditions. Exposure is most plausible on Linux systems, appliances, or containers using affected GnuTLS builds and PKCS#11 token initialization, including smartcard, HSM, or certificate-token workflows. Internet exposure is not established by the sources. Treat this as a moderate operational security issue. It is not currently supported as actively exploited, but patching should be scheduled promptly for affected Linux platforms and prioritized where PKCS#11-backed authentication or certificate infrastructure is business-critical. Mitigation focus: Apply relevant vendor updates from Red Hat or upstream GnuTLS guidance.; Prioritize systems using PKCS#11, smartcards, HSMs, or token initialization.; Update affected RHEL-based container images and redeploy dependent workloads..
Prepared
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-121 · source CWE mapping
Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.