1. A cookie is set using the `secure` keyword for `https://target`
2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with `http://target` (same
hostname, but using clear text HTTP) using the same cookie set
3. The same cookie name is set - but with just a slash as path (`path=\"/\",`).
Since this site is not secure, the cookie *should* just be ignored.
4. A bug in the path comparison logic makes curl read outside a heap buffer
boundary
The bug either causes a crash or it potentially makes the comparison come to
the wrong conclusion and lets the clear-text site override the contents of the
secure cookie, contrary to expectations and depending on the memory contents
immediately following the single-byte allocation that holds the path.
The presumed and correct behavior would be to plainly ignore the second set of
the cookie since it was already set as secure on a secure host so overriding
it on an insecure host should not be okay.
Security readout for executives and security teams
curl can mishandle a specific secure-cookie downgrade situation and read past a heap buffer. The main documented impact is a crash, with a possible incorrect cookie decision in edge cases. This matters because curl is widely embedded in automation, agents, appliances, and backend services. Exposure is most likely where affected curl versions 8.13.0, 8.14.0, 8.14.1, or 8.15.0 process cookies across HTTPS-to-HTTP interactions on the same hostname. Embedded curl in operating systems, appliances, CI jobs, and applications should be checked separately from the command-line binary. Treat as high priority for asset owners who rely on curl in production automation or embedded products. The known score is high because remote input can crash affected curl behavior. Patch planning should start now, while exploit activity should not be overstated from the provided evidence. Mitigation focus: Inventory curl binaries and libraries across hosts, containers, appliances, and vendor products.; Prioritize systems using curl cookies with redirects or mixed HTTP and HTTPS destinations.; Check curl vendor guidance for fixed releases and upgrade direction..
Prepared
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-125: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-125 · source CWE mapping
Out-of-bounds Read
Out-of-bounds Read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.