LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-71379: vllm - Regular Expression Denial of Service in Multiple Components

vLLM versions >= 0.6.3 and < 0.9.0 contain multiple regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) vulnerabilities. Several regex patterns — in vllm/lora/utils.py, the phi4mini tool parser, and the OpenAI-compatible serving chat endpoint — are susceptible to catastrophic backtracking. An attacker submitting crafted input with nested or repeated structures can trigger severe CPU consumption and performance degradation, resulting in denial of service.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-71379 affects vLLM deployments that process user-supplied model requests. Specially shaped inputs can make vulnerable regular expressions consume excessive CPU, slowing or denying service. This is a service availability issue, not described as data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-facing, customer-facing, or multi-tenant vLLM services. Treat as moderate business risk because it can disrupt AI service availability without evidence of data compromise or active exploitation.

Technical view

vLLM versions >= 0.6.3 and < 0.9.0 contain multiple CWE-1333 ReDoS flaws in LoRA utilities, the phi4mini tool parser, and the OpenAI-compatible serving chat endpoint. CVSS 4.0 is 5.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and low availability impact.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is vLLM 0.6.3 through 0.8.x used in shared or user-facing inference services, especially OpenAI-compatible chat endpoints or workloads using phi4mini tool parsing or LoRA-related processing.

Exploitation context

The bundle reports crafted nested or repeated input can trigger catastrophic regex backtracking and severe CPU consumption. KEV is false, and no provided source states active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE bundle, GHSA, and VulnCheck advisory. The bundle identifies affected version range and impacted components, but does not include exploit proof, active exploitation evidence, or detailed fixed commits.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected vLLM deployments to version 0.9.0 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for vendor-specific remediation details.
  • Limit access to vLLM inference endpoints to trusted authenticated users.
  • Apply rate limiting and request size controls where supported.
  • Monitor CPU saturation and inference latency for abnormal spikes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory vLLM versions across inference hosts and containers.
  • Flag versions >= 0.6.3 and < 0.9.0 as vulnerable.
  • Identify exposed OpenAI-compatible chat endpoints using vLLM.
  • Check whether phi4mini parsing or LoRA utilities are enabled.
  • Confirm upgraded systems report vLLM 0.9.0 or later.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1333: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-71379 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L2.81.4VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-71379Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
vllmvllm0.6.3, 0.9.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1333 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.