LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-71292: jfs: nlink overflow in jfs_rename

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: nlink overflow in jfs_rename If nlink is maximal for a directory (-1) and inside that directory you perform a rename for some child directory (not moving from the parent), then the nlink of the first directory is first incremented and later decremented. Normally this is fine, but when nlink = -1 this causes a wrap around to 0, and then drop_nlink issues a warning. After applying the patch syzbot no longer issues any warnings. I also ran some basic fs tests to look for any regressions.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Linux JFS directory can mishandle an already-maximal link count during a child-directory rename, wrapping the count to zero and triggering a kernel warning. The assigned CVSS 7.5 reflects potential availability impact, but the supplied evidence demonstrates a warning rather than a confirmed outage, data loss, or code execution.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-severity but exposure-dependent maintenance item. Promptly identify JFS usage, then patch affected critical hosts through supported kernel channels. Avoid emergency-wide action where JFS is absent. Escalate if warnings appear or vendor guidance confirms stronger availability consequences than the source bundle currently demonstrates.

Technical view

In jfs_rename, a same-parent child-directory rename temporarily increments and then decrements the parent directory's nlink. When nlink is maximal and represented as -1, the increment wraps it to zero; drop_nlink then warns. The referenced stable-kernel patches prevent the overflow. Syzbot stopped warning after the patch, and basic filesystem testing found no regressions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Linux systems using JFS with an affected kernel or a kernel lacking the referenced backport. Triggering also requires the unusual condition of a directory already having the maximal link count. The supplied version data is ambiguous, so determine exposure by vendor package guidance and fix-commit presence, not version strings alone.

Exploitation context

The supplied record is not in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation or a public exploit. Although the CVSS vector states network reachability and no privileges, the technical description concerns a JFS rename operation. That inconsistency should be resolved through vendor guidance before treating the flaw as remotely exploitable.

Researcher notes

The documented trigger is an edge-case metadata state: maximal directory nlink followed by a same-parent child-directory rename. Evidence establishes integer wraparound and a warning, not the full mechanism behind the CVSS availability rating. Exact affected ranges and remote exploitability remain unclear in the supplied bundle; validate against stable commits and distribution backports.

Mitigation direction

  • Install a vendor kernel update containing the applicable referenced stable-kernel fix.
  • Confirm the update includes the fix backport; package versions alone may be misleading.
  • Prioritize JFS hosts supporting critical services or untrusted filesystem workloads.
  • If updates are unavailable, obtain supported interim guidance from the Linux distribution vendor.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory mounted JFS filesystems and the kernel packages running on their hosts.
  • Check vendor advisories or package changelogs for the applicable referenced fix commit.
  • Review kernel logs for JFS, nlink, or drop_nlink warnings.
  • After updating, verify the fixed kernel is running and JFS workloads operate normally.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-71292 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Linux

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-71292Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinux1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2unaffected
LinuxLinux2.6.12, 0, 5.10.252, 5.15.202, 6.1.165, 6.6.128, 6.12.75, 6.18.16, 6.19.6, 7.0affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.