LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-71284: Synway SMG Gateway Management Software OS Command Injection via radius_address

Synway SMG Gateway Management Software contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the RADIUS configuration endpoint at /en/9-2radius.php where the radius_address POST parameter is split and interpolated directly into a sed command without sanitization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands by submitting a POST request with crafted radius_address, radius_address2, shared_secret2, source_ip, timeout, or retry parameters along with save=1 and enable_radius=1 to achieve remote code execution. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2025-07-11 (UTC).

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-71284 is a critical remote code execution issue in Synway SMG Gateway Management Software. An unauthenticated attacker may run operating-system commands through the RADIUS configuration function if the management interface is reachable. This can lead to full compromise of the gateway and possible disruption of voice or gateway services.

Executive priority

Prioritize within 24 hours for any exposed Synway SMG management interface. The business risk is device takeover and service disruption. If the interface is internal-only and tightly restricted, validate exposure and monitor, but still track vendor remediation because affected-version detail is incomplete.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-78 OS command injection in the RADIUS configuration endpoint, /en/9-2radius.php. Source material says user-controlled RADIUS POST parameters are interpolated into a shell sed command without sanitization. CVSS is 9.8: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is Synway SMG management software reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. Version data is incomplete in the source bundle, listing version “0,” so teams should treat exposed Synway SMG management interfaces as potentially affected until Synway or a trusted advisory clarifies scope.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status is false in the provided data. However, the source bundle states Shadowserver observed exploitation evidence on 2025-07-11, and public technical and scanner references exist. That combination suggests defenders should assume realistic attack interest, especially for internet-exposed management portals.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports unauthenticated command injection leading to RCE, but affected-version and patch details are incomplete in the provided sources. Avoid assuming all firmware builds are affected without vendor confirmation. Public exploit-oriented writeups and a nuclei template are referenced, so detection should focus on exposure, anomalous requests, and configuration integrity.

Mitigation direction

  • Remove internet exposure for Synway SMG management interfaces immediately.
  • Restrict access to trusted admin networks or VPN only.
  • Check Synway guidance for fixed firmware or official remediation.
  • Apply vendor updates when available and tested.
  • Monitor for suspicious RADIUS configuration changes or unexpected processes.
  • If compromise is suspected, isolate the device and preserve logs.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Synway SMG gateways and management URLs.
  • Confirm whether management interfaces are internet-accessible.
  • Review web logs for unusual POST activity to the RADIUS configuration page.
  • Check device configuration for unauthorized RADIUS changes.
  • Use approved vulnerability scanning only in controlled environments.
  • Document firmware versions and compare against vendor guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-71284 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-71284Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Synway Information Engineering Co., Ltd.Synway SMG Gateway Management Software0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.