LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-71259: BMC FootPrints ITSM 20.20.02 <= 20.24.01.001 Blind SSRF in externalfeed/RSS

BMC FootPrints ITSM versions 20.20.02 through 20.24.01.001 contain a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability in the externalfeed/RSS API component that allows authenticated attackers to trigger arbitrary outbound requests from the server. Attackers can exploit insufficient validation of externally supplied resource references to interact with internal services or cause resource exhaustion impacting availability. The following hotfixes remediate the vulnerability: 20.20.02, 20.20.03.002, 20.21.01.001, 20.21.02.002, 20.22.01, 20.22.01.001, 20.23.01, 20.23.01.002, and 20.24.01.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated user can make a vulnerable BMC FootPrints server send outbound requests through its RSS/external feed feature. This could let an attacker probe internal services indirectly or exhaust resources. The issue is medium severity, but FootPrints often supports business-critical IT service workflows, so exposed instances should be patched promptly.

Executive priority

Treat as a timely patching item, not an emergency. Raise priority for internet-facing FootPrints, sensitive internal networks, or weak authenticated-user controls.

Technical view

CVE-2025-71259 is a blind SSRF in BMC FootPrints ITSM externalfeed/RSS affecting versions 20.20.02 through 20.24.01.001. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.3 with network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and low availability impact. It maps to CWE-918.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where BMC FootPrints ITSM is reachable by authenticated users and can make outbound network requests. Internet-facing portals or broadly accessible internal deployments increase concern.

Exploitation context

The provided sources include a technical write-up and third-party advisory, but KEV status is false. No provided source establishes active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports authenticated blind SSRF with possible internal service interaction and availability impact. The bundle’s affected list is narrower than the description, so validate version exposure against BMC guidance before scoping broadly.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the BMC hotfix for the installed FootPrints release.
  • Prioritize versions 20.20.02 through 20.24.01.001 for remediation review.
  • Check BMC release notes for exact patch applicability and prerequisites.
  • Restrict unnecessary outbound traffic from FootPrints servers.
  • Monitor egress logs for unusual requests originating from FootPrints.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all BMC FootPrints ITSM instances and versions.
  • Verify whether the relevant 20.20.02 through 20.24.01 hotfix is installed.
  • Confirm authenticated access to RSS/external feed features is appropriately limited.
  • Review proxy, firewall, and server logs for unexpected outbound traffic.
  • Track BMC and advisory updates for corrected affected-version details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-71259 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N2.81.4VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-71259Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
BMC Software, Inc.FootPrints20.20.02unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.