LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-70082: An issue in Lantronix EDS3000PS v.3.1.0.0R2 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensiti...

An issue in Lantronix EDS3000PS v.3.1.0.0R2 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the ltrx_evo component

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Lantronix EDS3000PS version 3.1.0.0R2 could let an unauthenticated remote attacker run code, steal sensitive information, alter systems, or disrupt service. The supplied sources do not identify a patch or confirm attacks in the wild.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent asset-identification and containment issue because compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability without authentication. Prioritize exposed or operationally critical devices. Obtain vendor guidance promptly; the supplied evidence does not name a fixed version.

Technical view

The ltrx_evo component permits arbitrary code execution and information disclosure. CVSS 3.1 rates it 9.8: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Listed weaknesses include CWE-288, CWE-620, and CWE-78; the bundle does not provide deeper root-cause details.

Likely exposure

Confirmed scope is limited to Lantronix EDS3000PS v3.1.0.0R2 in the supplied description. Risk is greatest when affected device services are reachable from untrusted networks. The structured affected-product data is incomplete, so broader or narrower version exposure cannot be established here.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates remote, unauthenticated exploitation with low complexity and no user interaction. However, this CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence confirms active exploitation. Absence from KEV does not establish that exploitation has never occurred.

Researcher notes

CWE-78 suggests command injection, while CWE-288 and CWE-620 indicate authentication or credential-management concerns. The bundle does not establish how these weaknesses interact, which interfaces expose ltrx_evo, or whether multiple bugs are involved. Use the CISA advisory and CVE record to verify technical scope without assuming undocumented variants.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Lantronix EDS3000PS devices and record installed firmware versions.
  • Immediately restrict affected device access to trusted management networks and authorized administrators.
  • Prevent direct internet exposure using segmentation, firewalls, or access-control policies.
  • Check the CISA advisory and Lantronix guidance for supported remediation or updated firmware.
  • Preserve configuration backups and logs before applying vendor-approved changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether each EDS3000PS device runs version 3.1.0.0R2.
  • Review firewall and routing rules for untrusted access to affected devices.
  • Verify management access is limited to approved hosts and administrators.
  • Review device and network logs for unexplained access, changes, or outbound connections.
  • After remediation, confirm the installed version and repeat exposure checks.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-620: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-70082 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-70082Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-288 · source CWE mapping

CWE mapping pending import

This CVE carries a CWE mapping that will resolve to a full Glexia CWE intelligence page after the official CWE import is complete.

CWE-620 · source CWE mapping

CWE mapping pending import

This CVE carries a CWE mapping that will resolve to a full Glexia CWE intelligence page after the official CWE import is complete.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.