LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-69318: WordPress JobWP plugin <= 2.4.5 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hossni Mubarak JobWP jobwp allows Stored XSS.This issue affects JobWP: from n/a through <= 2.4.5.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-69318 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress JobWP plugin through version 2.4.5. If a vulnerable site processes malicious input and a user later views the affected page, script can run in that user’s browser. This can affect site trust, user sessions, and displayed content.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure, especially for public job sites or sites with untrusted submissions. Prioritize asset identification and vendor guidance review. Do not assume compromise from the CVE alone; the provided sources do not confirm active exploitation.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper neutralization during web page generation in Hossni Mubarak JobWP. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction required. Scope is changed, with low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

WordPress sites using the JobWP plugin at version 2.4.5 or earlier are potentially exposed. The source bundle does not identify affected configurations beyond the plugin and version range.

Exploitation context

The issue is stored XSS, so risk depends on whether attacker-controlled content can be saved and later viewed by another user. The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided data, and no cited source confirms active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE metadata and Patchstack database reference. No patch version, proof-of-concept, or exploitation-in-the-wild confirmation is included in the provided bundle. Validation should focus on version exposure, affected input/output paths, and safe content review without attempting exploit reproduction in production.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the JobWP plugin.
  • Identify any JobWP installations at version 2.4.5 or earlier.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release or workaround.
  • Update or disable the plugin where business risk is unacceptable.
  • Review stored job-related content for suspicious or unexpected script-like entries.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the installed JobWP version from WordPress administration or asset inventory.
  • Compare findings against the affected range: through version 2.4.5.
  • Verify whether a vendor-supported fixed version is available before deployment.
  • Review web application logs for unusual submissions to JobWP-controlled fields.
  • Document compensating controls if the plugin cannot be updated or disabled.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-69318 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-69318Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Hossni MubarakJobWPjobwp, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.