LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-68866: WordPress Dinatur plugin <= 1.18 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in woofer696 Dinatur dinatur allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Dinatur: from n/a through <= 1.18.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-68866 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Dinatur plugin up to version 1.18. An attacker could store malicious content that runs in another user’s browser when viewed. This can affect site trust, user sessions, and page integrity. Public sources do not confirm active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority WordPress plugin issue where Dinatur is deployed. Prioritize internet-facing and customer-facing sites because stored XSS can undermine user trust and session security. If Dinatur is not used, business urgency is low.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper input neutralization during web page generation in woofer696 Dinatur for WordPress, affecting versions through 1.18. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1 high: network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with the Dinatur plugin installed at version 1.18 or earlier. The provided data does not identify affected hosting platforms, themes, or a fixed plugin version.

Exploitation context

The scoring indicates remote exploitation may be possible without attacker authentication, but a victim must interact with affected page content. The issue is stored XSS, so malicious input may persist. CISA KEV is false, and no cited source states active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE data and Patchstack reference. The bundle names affected versions through 1.18 but does not provide a fixed version or detailed vulnerable parameter. Do not assume active exploitation or broader product impact without additional cited evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Dinatur plugin and record installed versions.
  • If Dinatur is version 1.18 or earlier, check vendor and Patchstack guidance immediately.
  • Apply an available vendor-approved update if one is published.
  • If no fixed version is available, consider disabling or removing Dinatur until guidance is available.
  • Restrict administrative access and monitor WordPress content changes for unexpected script-like entries.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Dinatur is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Compare installed Dinatur versions against the affected range: through 1.18.
  • Review the CVE and Patchstack entry for updated affected-version or fix information.
  • Check site pages and stored plugin-managed content for unexpected script-bearing content.
  • Verify remediation by confirming the plugin is updated, disabled, or removed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-68866 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-68866Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
woofer696Dinaturdinatur, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.