LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-68864: WordPress Infility Global plugin <= 2.15.11 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Infility Infility Global infility-global allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Infility Global: from n/a through <= 2.15.11.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-68864 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Infility Global plugin. If a vulnerable site processes malicious input, script could run in a visitor’s browser when viewed. The CVE rates this high severity. No provided source confirms active exploitation or names a patched version.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure review, especially for public sites. Prioritize confirming use of Infility Global, checking for vendor remediation, and reducing exposure if no fix is available. Urgency is tempered by no cited evidence of active exploitation.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-79 improper neutralization during web page generation in Infility Global for WordPress. The CVE description says versions through 2.15.11 are affected. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1: network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, changed scope, and low C/I/A impact.

Likely exposure

Potentially exposed assets are WordPress sites running Infility Global at versions up to 2.15.11, based on the CVE description. The source bundle has inconsistent version metadata, so teams should verify installed plugin versions directly against vendor or Patchstack guidance.

Exploitation context

The public data indicates exploitation would require a user to view affected content, but the attacker does not need prior privileges. No CISA KEV listing or supplied source indicates known active exploitation. The available sources do not provide exploit details, and none are included here.

Researcher notes

There is a notable data inconsistency: the CVE description says affected through 2.15.11, while the Patchstack reference URL slug mentions 2.14.49 and the affected object is not useful. Base scoping on installed plugin evidence and authoritative vendor/Patchstack updates.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify WordPress sites using the Infility Global plugin.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version.
  • Update the plugin if a vendor-supported fixed release is available.
  • If no fix is available, consider disabling the plugin where business impact allows.
  • Restrict administrative access and monitor affected sites for suspicious content changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress plugins and record Infility Global versions.
  • Compare installed versions with the CVE’s stated affected range through 2.15.11.
  • Review vendor or Patchstack advisories for corrected version information.
  • Confirm whether the plugin is active on public-facing WordPress sites.
  • Check web logs and content changes for unusual script injection indicators.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-68864 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-68864Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
InfilityInfility Globalinfility-global, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.