CVE-2025-68740: ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()
In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to
the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the 'if (!rc)' check
and sets 'result = true'. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing
extra files to be measured by IMA.
This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:
After unloading the SELinux policy module via 'semodule -d', if an IMA
measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,
in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the 'if (rc == -ESTALE &&
!rule_reinitialized)' block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In
ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule
becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ENOENT. This bypasses the 'if (!rc)' check and results in a false match.
Call trace:
selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8
security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0
ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0
ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8
ima_get_action+0x48/0x60
process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98
ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8
security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78
search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318
exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8
bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130
do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258
__arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68
invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
el0_svc+0x44/0x200
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x130
el0t_64_sync+0x3c8/0x3d0
Fix this by changing 'if (!rc)' to 'if (rc <= 0)' to ensure that error
codes like -ENOENT do not bypass the check and accidentally result in a
successful match.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This Linux kernel issue can make Integrity Measurement Architecture treat a failed LSM policy-rule lookup as a match. In the documented scenario, that causes extra files to be measured after a SELinux policy module is unloaded. The source does not show code execution, privilege escalation, data theft, or active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat as a focused kernel integrity-measurement correctness issue. Prioritize patching where IMA supports compliance, attestation, or high-assurance monitoring; broader emergency response is not supported by the provided evidence.
Technical view
In ima_match_rules(), negative errors from ima_filter_rule_match(), specifically -ENOENT after an -ESTALE retry and NULL rule, could bypass the intended non-match handling and set result=true. The fix changes the condition from !rc to rc <= 0 so error codes cannot become successful IMA rule matches.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most plausible on Linux systems using IMA with LSM/SELinux policy rules, especially where SELinux policy modules may be unloaded while IMA measurements occur. The bundle lists Linux kernels as affected but does not provide distribution package names.
Exploitation context
The source describes a reproducible race-like operational scenario involving SELinux module unloading and IMA rule refresh timing. KEV is false, and the bundle provides no evidence of public exploitation or weaponized abuse.
Researcher notes
The impact shown is false-positive IMA rule matching that measures extra files, not a bypass of measurement. Key edge case: -ESTALE triggers rule copy, removed SELinux module yields NULL rule and -ENOENT, then result was incorrectly set true.
Mitigation direction
Apply Linux kernel updates containing the referenced stable fixes.
Check distribution vendor advisories for exact fixed kernel package versions.
Prioritize systems using IMA and SELinux policy-based measurement rules.
Avoid unloading SELinux policy modules on IMA-dependent systems until patched, where operationally feasible.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux hosts using IMA and SELinux policy rules.
Compare running kernel versions against vendor fixed packages or referenced stable commits.
Review change records for SELinux policy module unload operations.
Monitor IMA measurement volume for unexpected increases around SELinux policy changes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2025-68740 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.