LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-68708: SailingLab AppLock (aka com.alpha.applock) 4.3.8 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access t...

SailingLab AppLock (aka com.alpha.applock) 4.3.8 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android's secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents - an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome). This results in information disclosure and privilege escalation.

LowCVSS 2.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a physical-access bypass in SailingLab AppLock for Android version 4.3.8. The app reportedly protects other apps with an overlay PIN screen rather than Android secure authentication APIs, allowing the protection to be evaded through alternate interface flows. Business impact is limited but real where the app is trusted to protect sensitive mobile data.

Executive priority

Treat this as low urgency unless the organization relies on AppLock to protect sensitive mobile data. It should be handled through mobile-device inventory and policy cleanup, not emergency response. Prioritize shared, executive, or regulated-data devices first.

Technical view

CVE-2025-68708 is a CWE-288 authentication bypass affecting SailingLab AppLock, also identified as com.alpha.applock, 4.3.8 for Android. The CVSS 3.1 score is 2.4, with physical attack vector and low confidentiality impact. Sources state exposed navigation routes via advertisement or browser intents can evade overlay-based lock verification.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to Android devices running SailingLab AppLock com.alpha.applock version 4.3.8. This is not a network-exploitable enterprise infrastructure issue. Risk is higher on shared, lost, unattended, or BYOD phones where AppLock is relied on to protect browser or application data.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires local physical access to the Android device. The public description says bypass is possible through interface navigation paths, but the provided evidence does not establish broad exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE names AppLock 4.3.8 and describes overlay-based protection bypass, but affected CPEs are listed as n/a and no fixed version is provided. Avoid assuming other AppLock versions or products are affected without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Android devices for com.alpha.applock version 4.3.8.
  • Do not rely on AppLock as a primary control for sensitive apps.
  • Check vendor or Google Play guidance for updates or removal advice.
  • Prefer Android platform authentication, work profiles, and device lock policies.
  • Remove or restrict the app on managed high-risk devices if no fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether managed devices have SailingLab AppLock installed.
  • Record installed package name and version from device inventory.
  • Review whether sensitive apps depend on AppLock for access control.
  • Test only in a controlled device lab with owner authorization.
  • Monitor CVE and vendor references for fixed-version information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-68708 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.4CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N0.91.4CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

2.4Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-68708Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-288 · source CWE mapping

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.