CVE-2025-68708: SailingLab AppLock (aka com.alpha.applock) 4.3.8 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access t...
SailingLab AppLock (aka com.alpha.applock) 4.3.8 for Android allows a local attacker with physical access to bypass the PIN lock. The lock is implemented as an overlay rather than by using Android's secure authentication APIs. By navigating cascading interface flows - insecure navigation through exposed routes facilitates app control evasion {I.N.T.E.R.F.A.C.E] via advertisement or browser intents - an attacker can evade lockscreen verification and access protected apps (e.g., Chrome). This results in information disclosure and privilege escalation.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This CVE describes a physical-access bypass in SailingLab AppLock for Android version 4.3.8. The app reportedly protects other apps with an overlay PIN screen rather than Android secure authentication APIs, allowing the protection to be evaded through alternate interface flows. Business impact is limited but real where the app is trusted to protect sensitive mobile data.
Executive priority
Treat this as low urgency unless the organization relies on AppLock to protect sensitive mobile data. It should be handled through mobile-device inventory and policy cleanup, not emergency response. Prioritize shared, executive, or regulated-data devices first.
Technical view
CVE-2025-68708 is a CWE-288 authentication bypass affecting SailingLab AppLock, also identified as com.alpha.applock, 4.3.8 for Android. The CVSS 3.1 score is 2.4, with physical attack vector and low confidentiality impact. Sources state exposed navigation routes via advertisement or browser intents can evade overlay-based lock verification.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to Android devices running SailingLab AppLock com.alpha.applock version 4.3.8. This is not a network-exploitable enterprise infrastructure issue. Risk is higher on shared, lost, unattended, or BYOD phones where AppLock is relied on to protect browser or application data.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires local physical access to the Android device. The public description says bypass is possible through interface navigation paths, but the provided evidence does not establish broad exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse. The CVE names AppLock 4.3.8 and describes overlay-based protection bypass, but affected CPEs are listed as n/a and no fixed version is provided. Avoid assuming other AppLock versions or products are affected without vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Inventory Android devices for com.alpha.applock version 4.3.8.
Do not rely on AppLock as a primary control for sensitive apps.
Check vendor or Google Play guidance for updates or removal advice.
Prefer Android platform authentication, work profiles, and device lock policies.
Remove or restrict the app on managed high-risk devices if no fix is available.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether managed devices have SailingLab AppLock installed.
Record installed package name and version from device inventory.
Review whether sensitive apps depend on AppLock for access control.
Test only in a controlled device lab with owner authorization.
Monitor CVE and vendor references for fixed-version information.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-288 · source CWE mapping
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.