LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-67268: gpsd before commit dc966aa contains a heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the drivers/driver_nm...

gpsd before commit dc966aa contains a heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the drivers/driver_nmea2000.c file. The hnd_129540 function, which handles NMEA2000 PGN 129540 (GNSS Satellites in View) packets, fails to validate the user-supplied satellite count against the size of the skyview array (184 elements). This allows an attacker to write beyond the bounds of the array by providing a satellite count up to 255, leading to memory corruption, Denial of Service (DoS), and potentially arbitrary code execution.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw is a memory corruption bug in gpsd’s NMEA2000 satellite-view packet handling. A malicious or malformed packet can exceed an internal array limit, potentially crashing gpsd and, according to the CVSS assessment, could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent where gpsd processes network-reachable or untrusted NMEA2000 data, especially in operational systems relying on GNSS. Prioritize inventory first because the bundle lacks exact affected package versions.

Technical view

In drivers/driver_nmea2000.c, hnd_129540 handles PGN 129540 without validating a supplied satellite count against the 184-element skyview array. Counts up to 255 can trigger a heap out-of-bounds write. The record identifies CWE-122 and CWE-1285 and scores it CVSS 9.8.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to systems running gpsd code before commit dc966aa that process NMEA2000 GNSS Satellites in View packets. The bundle does not identify exact affected packaged versions or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. It states network, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation is possible by supplying crafted packet data, but detailed exploitability in real deployments is not proven here.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is product/version mapping: affected vendor, product, versions, and CPEs are listed as n/a. The root issue is a count-to-array-bounds validation failure in hnd_129540, fixed by upstream commit dc966aa per the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Update gpsd to a build containing commit dc966aa or later.
  • Apply relevant vendor advisories, including listed Red Hat RHSAs where applicable.
  • If packaged fixes are unclear, check the operating system vendor’s CVE guidance.
  • Restrict gpsd/NMEA2000 inputs to trusted devices and networks until remediated.
  • Monitor gpsd crashes or memory-corruption symptoms after GNSS/NMEA2000 traffic.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts and appliances running gpsd.
  • Confirm whether the deployed gpsd build predates commit dc966aa.
  • Check whether gpsd processes NMEA2000 PGN 129540 traffic in the environment.
  • Verify vendor package status against Red Hat CVE, CSAF, or errata guidance.
  • Confirm fixed packages or source revisions are deployed after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
11

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1285: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-67268 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-67268Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
redhat-SADPgpsd: gpsd: Arbitrary code execution via heap-based out-of-bounds write in NMEA2000 packet handling
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-01-02T17:01:54.750Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-01-02T00:00:00.000Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-1285 · source CWE mapping

Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input

Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.