LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-67041: An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS3000PS 3.1.0.0R2.

An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS3000PS 3.1.0.0R2. The host parameter of the TFTP client in the Filesystem Browser page is not properly sanitized. This can be exploited to escape from the original command and execute an arbitrary one with root privileges.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Lantronix EDS3000PS firmware 3.1.0.0R2 may let an unauthenticated remote attacker take complete control of the device. A malicious value supplied to the TFTP client’s host field can run operating-system commands as root, threatening device confidentiality, integrity, availability, and connected operations.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed 3.1.0.0R2 deployments as an urgent remediation priority, especially in operational or internet-reachable environments. Root-level compromise could disrupt device operations and provide access to sensitive configurations. Do not interpret the absence from KEV as evidence of safety; prioritize inventory, access restriction, monitoring, and vendor-directed remediation.

Technical view

The Filesystem Browser’s TFTP client does not properly sanitize its host parameter, enabling operating-system command injection and arbitrary command execution with root privileges. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The record associates CWE-78, CWE-288, and CWE-620 with the issue.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest where an EDS3000PS running 3.1.0.0R2 has its affected management functionality reachable from untrusted or broadly accessible networks. The bundle does not identify other affected versions or products. Organizations should inventory firmware versions and verify whether access to the Filesystem Browser is tightly restricted.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is technically severe because exploitation requires neither authentication nor user interaction and yields root-level command execution. However, the supplied record says it is not in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and the sources provided do not establish active exploitation or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

The supplied description clearly identifies an unsanitized TFTP host parameter and root command execution, consistent with CWE-78. The CVSS score is 9.8. Evidence is incomplete regarding additional affected versions, attack-path prerequisites beyond the vector, patches, workarounds, public proof-of-concept code, and observed exploitation. Validation should remain non-invasive in production environments.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Lantronix and CISA guidance for an approved firmware update or vendor-specific remediation.
  • Restrict device management access to trusted administrative networks and authorized hosts.
  • Block untrusted network access to the Filesystem Browser and related TFTP functionality where operationally feasible.
  • Monitor affected devices for unexpected configuration changes, processes, connections, or service disruption.
  • If remediation is unavailable, isolate affected devices and apply compensating network controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory EDS3000PS devices and confirm their exact installed firmware versions.
  • Verify whether any identified device runs version 3.1.0.0R2.
  • Review firewall and access-control rules governing each device’s management interface.
  • Confirm untrusted users cannot reach the Filesystem Browser or TFTP client functionality.
  • Review device and network logs for unusual administrative activity or outbound connections.
  • Verify vendor-recommended remediation after implementation without attempting command injection.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-620: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-67041 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-67041Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-288 · source CWE mapping

CWE mapping pending import

This CVE carries a CWE mapping that will resolve to a full Glexia CWE intelligence page after the official CWE import is complete.

CWE-620 · source CWE mapping

CWE mapping pending import

This CVE carries a CWE mapping that will resolve to a full Glexia CWE intelligence page after the official CWE import is complete.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.