LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-67034: An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3.

An issue was discovered in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. An authenticated attacker can inject OS commands into the "name" parameter when deleting SSL credentials through the management interface. Injected commands are executed with root privileges.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets someone with a valid account on a Lantronix EDS5000 management interface run operating-system commands as root. That turns a compromised or misused device login into full device control. The source bundle does not confirm a vendor patch or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority OT/industrial device exposure issue. Prioritize internet- or broadly reachable management interfaces first, then confirm vendor remediation guidance before scheduling firmware or configuration changes.

Technical view

CVE-2025-67034 is authenticated OS command injection in Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3. The vulnerable input is the SSL credential deletion name parameter in the management interface. Successful exploitation executes injected commands with root privileges. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8: network reachable, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is organizations operating Lantronix EDS5000 2.1.0.0R3 where the management interface is reachable by authenticated users. The bundle’s structured affected-product fields are incomplete, so validate against CISA and Lantronix records before expanding scope.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. The practical risk is high because any valid account with access to the vulnerable workflow could escalate to root-level command execution on the device.

Researcher notes

The record identifies command injection during SSL credential deletion, but the provided source bundle does not include exploit details, patch status, or complete affected CPE metadata. Avoid assuming broader Lantronix impact without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check CISA and Lantronix guidance for patched firmware or named mitigations.
  • Restrict management interface access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Remove unnecessary accounts and review privileges on exposed devices.
  • Monitor for unexpected SSL credential deletion or configuration activity.
  • Isolate affected devices if management exposure cannot be controlled.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Lantronix EDS5000 devices and record firmware versions.
  • Identify any devices running 2.1.0.0R3.
  • Confirm whether management interfaces are network reachable.
  • Review account lists for unnecessary or shared credentials.
  • Check logs for suspicious SSL credential management activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-67034 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-67034Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.