CVE-2025-66835: TrueConf Client 8.5.2 is vulnerable to DLL hijacking via crafted wfapi.dll allowing local attackers to exec...
TrueConf Client 8.5.2 is vulnerable to DLL hijacking via crafted wfapi.dll allowing local attackers to execute arbitrary code within the user's context.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This issue lets a local attacker abuse how TrueConf Client 8.5.2 loads a Windows DLL, causing attacker-controlled code to run as the signed-in user. It is not described as remote exploitation, but it can amplify damage after initial local access.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority endpoint hardening and patch-management item where TrueConf Client is deployed. Business urgency rises on systems used by privileged staff or handling sensitive communications.
Technical view
CVE-2025-66835 is a CWE-427 DLL hijacking issue in TrueConf Client 8.5.2 involving wfapi.dll loading. The CVSS 3.1 vector is local, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Organizations with TrueConf Client 8.5.2 installed on Windows endpoints are the likely exposure group. The CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete and lists vendor/product as n/a.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed in KEV in the supplied bundle. The cited description requires local attacker access and does not establish active exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
Evidence supports a local DLL hijacking vulnerability with user-context code execution. The public bundle does not provide complete affected CPE data, vendor confirmation, patch status, or in-the-wild exploitation evidence.
Mitigation direction
Inventory endpoints for TrueConf Client 8.5.2.
Check TrueConf guidance for a fixed version or official workaround.
Restrict write access to application directories and DLL search locations.
Use application control to limit untrusted DLL loading.
Prioritize remediation on shared, high-privilege, or sensitive workstations.
Validation and detection
Confirm installed TrueConf Client versions across managed endpoints.
Review whether affected systems allow standard users to write near loaded libraries.
Check EDR telemetry for suspicious DLL loads tied to TrueConf Client.
Verify whether vendor advisories name a patched build or mitigation.
Document systems where product ownership or version data is uncertain.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-427: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-427 · source CWE mapping
Uncontrolled Search Path Element
Uncontrolled Search Path Element represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.